On February 12, it was reported that in 2026, the American Bankers Association (ABA) officially sent a letter to the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), demanding an immediate halt to the review of national bank charters for multiple cryptocurrency companies, including Ripple, Circle, and other related applicants. This move is seen as a strong countermeasure by the traditional American banking system against the expansion of the digital asset sector.
In the letter, the ABA stated that until Congress completes a regulatory framework for crypto finance, the OCC should not continue processing these applications at the traditional banking approval pace. The association emphasized that regulators must thoroughly assess applicants’ compliance responsibilities, capital structures, and potential systemic risks before issuing any charters.
One of the contentious issues is the GENIUS Act. The ABA criticized the OCC for tying charter approvals to this bill, which still requires several federal agencies to complete supporting regulations, and full implementation could take years. The ABA is concerned that issuing licenses prematurely, before the regulatory system is fully developed, could increase bankruptcy and liquidity risks.
Currently, Ripple’s application is the most closely watched. The company previously received conditional approval from the OCC, which was seen as a step away from full licensing. This development has triggered strong opposition from the ABA. Additionally, World Liberty Financial has also applied to become a federally chartered national trust bank, sparking controversy in political circles.
Besides these companies, Circle, BitGo, Paxos, and Laser Digital, a subsidiary of Nomura Securities, have also been mentioned as relevant cases. The ABA also warned that some crypto institutions might bypass restrictions on interest income outlined in the GENIUS Act through affiliated platforms, creating regulatory arbitrage.
This incident indicates that the battle between the US crypto finance sector and the traditional banking system is escalating. As legislative and regulatory processes continue to advance, whether the OCC will adjust its review pace will directly impact the institutionalization of the US digital asset industry.
Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third parties and does not represent the views or opinions of Gate. The content displayed on this page is for reference only and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Gate does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information and shall not be liable for any losses arising from the use of this information. Virtual asset investments carry high risks and are subject to significant price volatility. You may lose all of your invested principal. Please fully understand the relevant risks and make prudent decisions based on your own financial situation and risk tolerance. For details, please refer to
Disclaimer.
Related Articles
U.S. FDIC Chair: Under the GENIUS Act, stablecoins are "absolutely not" covered by deposit insurance
The Chairman of the FDIC in the United States emphasized that under the GENIUS Act, stablecoins (such as USDT, USDC) are not covered by FDIC deposit insurance to distinguish them from traditional bank deposits and prevent misleading investors. Additionally, although banks can issue stablecoins, they must adhere to strict reserve requirements.
動區BlockTempo4h ago
The Night Before Hong Kong Stablecoin License: Institutional Breakthroughs and a Panorama Scan Amid Global Changes
Author: Coinfound
By March 2026, the global digital financial market will be at a critical crossroads of regulatory restructuring and industry revaluation. Hong Kong is about to issue the first batch of licenses for fiat-backed stablecoin issuers. This is not just a routine licensing approval but a landmark event signaling that Hong Kong's digital financial infrastructure is entering a practical phase.
On the surface, this is regulatory implementation; but on a deeper level, it signifies that Hong Kong is trying to answer a more strategically important question: in the context of accelerating US-China digital financial competition and tightening global compliance frameworks, how can Hong Kong build a trustworthy system through the stablecoin regime that supports cross-border payments, enterprise-level treasury management, and RWA tokenization settlement?
CoinFound believes that understanding the significance of the “night before the license” should not only focus on who will receive the first batch of licenses but also on what Hong Kong ultimately aims to reshape with this system.
PANews5h ago
Is The Future Fed Setting Up For Another Shot At A CBDC?
A recent meeting between Senator Cynthia Lummis and Fed chair nominee Kevin Warsh reignited debates over a potential Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC). While Lummis supports financial innovations, Warsh favors a wholesale CBDC, opposing retail ones due to privacy concerns.
Blockzeit5h ago
The first in the U.S.! Florida's "Stablecoin Bill" passes successfully, and the government will accept stablecoin payments
Florida passes the first stablecoin regulation bill in the United States, SB 314, bringing stablecoins into the money services regulatory framework and establishing their legal status. The law requires stablecoin issuers to comply with traditional financial standards and emphasizes consumer protection and anti-money laundering measures. This move aims to attract Web3 companies, enhance transparency of digital assets, and balance innovation with financial stability. The state government also plans to allow the use of stablecoins for paying state-level service fees, demonstrating the increasing legalization trend of digital assets.
区块客6h ago
Revealed: How Russian businessmen use cryptocurrencies and "zero cross-border settlements" to solve 40% exchange rate losses in trade with Iran?
Russian companies, in response to losses caused by Iran's dual exchange rate system, have developed cryptocurrency transfer, underground hawala exchanges, and internal settlement systems, successfully reducing export losses. However, after the outbreak of war in 2025, this financial system came to a complete halt, affecting cross-border transactions and logistics.
動區BlockTempo6h ago
US Lawmakers Introduce Death Bets Act to Ban War Betting
Two US lawmakers have introduced a new bill. That aims to stop people from betting on violent global events. The proposal is called the Death Bets Act. It would ban prediction markets from offering bets related to war, terrorism, assassination or a person’s death. The bill was introduced on
Coinfomania8h ago
