On February 28, U.S. lawmakers from both parties jointly introduced the “Promoting Innovation in Blockchain Development Act” on February 26, aiming to clarify the legal responsibilities of blockchain developers and prevent open-source code authors from being mistakenly classified as remittance institutions. The proposal, led by Scott Fitzgerald, Ben Cline, and Zoe Lofgren, focuses on amending Section 1960 of the U.S. Code to target custodians who control customer assets or execute transfers on behalf of users.
The bill suggests that, amid rising debates over whether “open-source software developers should bear remittance licensing responsibilities” and “legal risks for non-custodial blockchain developers,” clear exemptions should be provided for entities that only write or distribute code. The ongoing lawsuits related to Tornado Cash have further amplified industry concerns about “code as crime.” Ben Cline noted that long-term regulatory expansion blurs the line between malicious actors and technological innovators; Scott Fitzgerald also emphasized that innovators should not face undue law enforcement pressure for developing infrastructure.
Industry support has come from the Solana Institute and the Blockchain Association, which believe the bill will help establish a clear framework distinguishing “open-source developers from custodial financial intermediaries.” Meanwhile, discussions in Washington also include topics like the CLARITY Act and the GENIUS Act. The former, passed by the House in 2025 but with slowed progress, aims to clarify regulations, while the latter enhances stablecoin oversight without expanding developer responsibilities.
Analysts believe that if enacted, the “Promoting Innovation in Blockchain Development Act” will set a precedent for reshaping the U.S. crypto regulatory framework and defining blockchain developers’ compliance boundaries. Ongoing lobbying efforts continue, and the specific wording and scope of the Section 1960 amendments could be a key factor influencing U.S. crypto policy in 2026.
Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third parties and does not represent the views or opinions of Gate. The content displayed on this page is for reference only and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Gate does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information and shall not be liable for any losses arising from the use of this information. Virtual asset investments carry high risks and are subject to significant price volatility. You may lose all of your invested principal. Please fully understand the relevant risks and make prudent decisions based on your own financial situation and risk tolerance. For details, please refer to
Disclaimer.
Related Articles
SEC Commissioner: Will Carefully Study "Innovation Exemption" for Tokenized Securities, Focus on Key Issues Such as Information Disclosure
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Commissioner Hester M. Peirce announced the launch of an "Innovation Safe Harbor" program for tokenized securities, which will allow limited trading and experimentation within a restricted scope. The program will take a more cautious approach, explore different tokenization models, and consider investor protection mechanisms. The SEC is also evaluating related disclosure and regulatory issues.
GateNews10m ago
A South Korean CEX Will Face Sanctions Review Tomorrow, Fines Could Exceed 352 Billion Won
Gate News reports that on March 15, a certain South Korean CEX will undergo sanctions review on March 16. Since its unreported transaction volume exceeds another South Korean CEX, the market widely expects that fines against this exchange may exceed 35.2 billion Korean won, and some operational suspension periods may also be longer than 6 months.
GateNews49m ago
Uncertainty in stablecoin regulation causes traditional banks to delay infrastructure investments, while crypto companies offering 4%-5% returns may accelerate capital migration.
Unclear stablecoin regulations create operational difficulties for traditional banks, while crypto companies continue to develop in gray areas. Banks are hesitant to make large-scale investments in stablecoin infrastructure due to advice from legal counsel, resulting in limited deployment. While large-scale deposit outflows have not yet occurred, competitive pressure is increasing.
GateNews1h ago
CLARITY Act Passage Odds Drop Without April Committee Vote
Analysts warn the CLARITY Act must pass a Senate committee by April or chances of 2026 passage drop sharply.
Dispute over stablecoin rewards between banks and crypto firms remains the main legislative obstacle.
Additional debates on DeFi regulation, SEC authority, and developer
CryptoFrontNews2h ago
US Senate Bans CBDC: What Happens to Its Wholesale Version?
The US Senate’s newly passed Housing Act does not clearly distinguish between retail and wholesale versions of a CBDC.
The definition of the act, though, implies that the CBDC prohibition applies only to the retail version, which is designed to be widely available to the public.
The US Senate
Blockzeit5h ago
