Many people see this record and their first reaction is: “24 hours, $80,000? Probably another AI bot harvesting profits story.” But what’s truly worth paying attention to isn’t Claude, nor GitHub. The fact is: this is a new account that made only 13 predictions and achieved nearly $80,000 in results within 24 hours. The trades are concentrated in short-term markets for BTC / ETH, with no diversification, no narrative accounts. This isn’t about a clever model; with so few samples, talking about win rate is meaningless. But one thing is very clear — this isn’t waiting for “market settlement,” but quickly entering and exiting when the price shifts. This directly refutes luck theory. If it were just gambling on outcomes, such a pattern wouldn’t appear in only 13 trades. What truly matters is capturing the lag in short-term price updates. CEX has already moved, Polymarket hasn’t fully reacted yet. That few-minute window is the entire profit source. The behavior pattern is actually very simple: low-frequency trades, only appearing when mispricing is most obvious; concentrated volume, using funds to absorb liquidity gaps; not fighting, not waiting for settlement, just taking “the right part.” Why do most people fail to make money? Because they focus on “how to build a bot” or “what AI to use,” and overlook a harsher reality: in this kind of market, speed, discipline, and capital are the core variables, not how pretty the code is. You can check this account’s transaction records yourself. What you should really think about isn’t “can I replicate this script,” but — when short-term markets increasingly resemble a game between machines, what methods do humans still use to provide liquidity? If you want to use copy trading on Polymarket, I recommend: #polymarket