On February 12, it was reported that in a congressional hearing, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Chair Paul Atkins faced sharp questioning from Democratic lawmakers, focusing on the agency’s suspension of enforcement actions against Tron founder Justin Sun. Legislators believe that this decision may not be solely about compliance considerations but could involve more complex political and financial interests.
The core of the controversy lies in the fact that Justin Sun has invested over $75 million in crypto projects related to the Trump family, including World Liberty Financial, and has appeared publicly alongside Eric Trump. These backgrounds have led some lawmakers to worry that the SEC’s enforcement impartiality is being tested, and they have demanded that Atkins explain the true reasons behind the suspension.
In response to the questions, Atkins refused to comment on specific cases, stating that regulatory rules do not permit disclosure of ongoing investigations or enforcement suspensions. He emphasized that all SEC decisions are based on law and facts, not external pressure. He also expressed willingness to provide confidential explanations to lawmakers in a closed-door meeting but did not confirm whether the case would be resumed.
During the hearing, Atkins also discussed the direction of the U.S. cryptocurrency regulatory framework. He pointed out that the SEC is collaborating with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) to advance the “Clear Act,” which aims to clearly distinguish digital commodities from digital securities, with some regulatory responsibilities potentially shifting to the CFTC. Supporters believe this move could reduce market uncertainty and help companies better understand compliance boundaries; opponents worry it might weaken investor protections.
The suspension of enforcement and the push for new legislation are seen as significant signals of a strategic shift in U.S. cryptocurrency regulation toward 2026. Policy is moving from aggressive enforcement to a focus on clearer rules and institutional coordination. However, doubts about political connections remain, and Congress will continue to monitor developments. The SEC’s next steps will not only impact the digital asset market but also influence the credibility of U.S. financial regulation.
Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third parties and does not represent the views or opinions of Gate. The content displayed on this page is for reference only and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Gate does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information and shall not be liable for any losses arising from the use of this information. Virtual asset investments carry high risks and are subject to significant price volatility. You may lose all of your invested principal. Please fully understand the relevant risks and make prudent decisions based on your own financial situation and risk tolerance. For details, please refer to
Disclaimer.
Related Articles
A court rules that sports betting contract agreements are derivatives! The US CFTC blocks local law enforcement and fights for regulatory control of prediction markets.
The U.S. federal government is working jointly with the CFTC and the Department of Justice to try to shift regulatory authority over Kalshi prediction markets from local governments to the federal government, arguing that sports betting contracts are financial derivatives. If the court supports this position, it will change the legal status of prediction markets and unify regulation nationwide, reducing the impact of local gambling laws.
CryptoCity32m ago
Holding sports betting contracts as derivatives! The U.S. CFTC blocks local enforcement and seeks regulatory control over prediction markets
The U.S. federal government is working with the CFTC and the Department of Justice to try to shift regulatory authority over Kalshi prediction markets from state and local governments to the federal government, arguing that sports betting contracts are financial derivatives. If the court supports this position, it would change the legal status of prediction markets and standardize regulation nationwide, reducing the impact of state and local gambling laws.
CryptoCity3h ago
Polymarket Investigation Demanded by Congress After 50 New Accounts Bet on Iran Ceasefire Before Trump Announced It
Congressional scrutiny arises over Polymarket after over 50 new accounts placed bets on a US-Iran ceasefire just before Trump's announcement. Lawmakers are demanding a CFTC investigation, highlighting concerns about insider trading and the platform's regulatory status.
Cryptonews3h ago
A judge blocks Arizona from regulating prediction markets, halts the lawsuit against Kalshi
A U.S. federal court ruled to pause Arizona’s regulatory actions against the prediction market platform Kalshi, finding that the federal government has priority in regulating financial derivatives. The platform argues that its event contracts are not traditional gambling, but financial instruments. This ruling may affect a nationwide, unified regulatory framework for financial markets.
ChainNewsAbmedia5h ago
CLARITY Act Advances to Reshape U.S. Crypto Regulation
The U.S. Senate aims to reshape crypto regulation with the CLARITY Act, gaining majority support. The act seeks to clarify whether crypto assets are securities or commodities, addressing regulatory confusion and impacting global markets positively.
BlockChainReporter6h ago
Sports betting contracts are derivatives! The U.S. CFTC blocks local enforcement, seeking regulatory authority over prediction markets
The U.S. federal government is working with the CFTC and the Department of Justice to try to shift regulatory authority over Kalshi prediction markets from local governments to the federal level, arguing that sports betting contracts are financial derivatives. If the court supports this position, it will change the legal status of prediction markets and standardize regulation nationwide, reducing the influence of local gambling laws.
CryptoCity6h ago
