#链上资产管理 Trend Research's position data just got corrected, adjusted from the previously rumored 628k ETH to 58w ETH. This correction is quite interesting — the exclusion of addresses starting with 0x9f indicates that on-chain tracking requires more careful verification of address ownership.
580,000 ETH at current price levels represents a market value of over 20 billion USD, and the movements of such large positions have reference value for market liquidity and price expectations. The key is to watch the subsequent on-chain behavior of these 6 building positions — whether holdings remain stable or show signs of reduction, transfer frequency, etc. These factors can all reflect the institution's actual stance.
The topic of data transparency deserves attention. While on-chain information is public, the attribution of addresses often exists in a gray area. When making research and investment decisions, you cannot rely solely on on-chain data from a single source. Cross-verifying information from different institutions and channels can reduce the risk of misjudgment.
Trang này có thể chứa nội dung của bên thứ ba, được cung cấp chỉ nhằm mục đích thông tin (không phải là tuyên bố/bảo đảm) và không được coi là sự chứng thực cho quan điểm của Gate hoặc là lời khuyên về tài chính hoặc chuyên môn. Xem Tuyên bố từ chối trách nhiệm để biết chi tiết.
#链上资产管理 Trend Research's position data just got corrected, adjusted from the previously rumored 628k ETH to 58w ETH. This correction is quite interesting — the exclusion of addresses starting with 0x9f indicates that on-chain tracking requires more careful verification of address ownership.
580,000 ETH at current price levels represents a market value of over 20 billion USD, and the movements of such large positions have reference value for market liquidity and price expectations. The key is to watch the subsequent on-chain behavior of these 6 building positions — whether holdings remain stable or show signs of reduction, transfer frequency, etc. These factors can all reflect the institution's actual stance.
The topic of data transparency deserves attention. While on-chain information is public, the attribution of addresses often exists in a gray area. When making research and investment decisions, you cannot rely solely on on-chain data from a single source. Cross-verifying information from different institutions and channels can reduce the risk of misjudgment.