Recently, I have been monitoring the spot and perpetual contract markets of $TRUTH and discovered a potential arbitrage opportunity.
The spot price is pegged at 0.01 USDT, while the perpetual contract is quoted at about 0.00992 USDT, with a spread of approximately 0.8%. More interestingly, the funding rate is currently negative (around -0.05%/hour), which means long contract holders can receive funding fee compensation.
Theoretically, the strategy is straightforward: go long on the perpetual contract while shorting the equivalent amount of spot. If the spread converges within an hour, the gross profit can reach 0.8%. But reality is always more complicated.
The real costs come from—bilateral trading fees eating up about 0.2%, plus slippage losses, which immediately reduce net profit to below 0.5%. Even more disheartening, TRUTH's trading volume has recently plummeted sharply, with a decline of 98.7%, and liquidity has become very poor.
This introduces two key risks: first, the spread continues to widen, leading to forced liquidation on one side; second, there are simply not enough counterparties for the spot, making it impossible to close positions smoothly. After weighing the options, I have decided to stay on the sidelines for now. The profit margin is too small, and the risks are too high to gamble. I will continue to review previous losses and prioritize prudence.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
DarkPoolWatcher
· 21h ago
Trading volume collapsed by 98.7%. Still daring to play arbitrage? The liquidity is so poor that it can't even support the market.
View OriginalReply0
BTCRetirementFund
· 21h ago
98.7% trading volume collapsed and you're still playing arbitrage? Isn't that asking for death? Haha. With liquidity like this, who dares to take over?
View OriginalReply0
rekt_but_vibing
· 21h ago
Wait, a 98.7% plunge in trading volume? You can find arbitrage opportunities like that? Man, you're really living in a theoretical world.
View OriginalReply0
MEVvictim
· 21h ago
Trading volume drops by 98.7%. Still want to arbitrage? Are you looking for death? Once liquidity collapses, there's no way to escape.
View OriginalReply0
0xSoulless
· 21h ago
A 0.8% spread sounds appealing, but when you do the math, it vanishes instantly... This is the crypto world, where paper gains are always the most attractive.
View OriginalReply0
MysteriousZhang
· 21h ago
Arbitrage sounds great, but if the trading volume crashes, it's game over. With such poor liquidity, do you really dare to buy the dip?
View OriginalReply0
SerumSquirter
· 22h ago
A 0.8% spread sounds attractive, but in the end, the fees cut into the net profit, a classic illusion of paper arbitrage.
Recently, I have been monitoring the spot and perpetual contract markets of $TRUTH and discovered a potential arbitrage opportunity.
The spot price is pegged at 0.01 USDT, while the perpetual contract is quoted at about 0.00992 USDT, with a spread of approximately 0.8%. More interestingly, the funding rate is currently negative (around -0.05%/hour), which means long contract holders can receive funding fee compensation.
Theoretically, the strategy is straightforward: go long on the perpetual contract while shorting the equivalent amount of spot. If the spread converges within an hour, the gross profit can reach 0.8%. But reality is always more complicated.
The real costs come from—bilateral trading fees eating up about 0.2%, plus slippage losses, which immediately reduce net profit to below 0.5%. Even more disheartening, TRUTH's trading volume has recently plummeted sharply, with a decline of 98.7%, and liquidity has become very poor.
This introduces two key risks: first, the spread continues to widen, leading to forced liquidation on one side; second, there are simply not enough counterparties for the spot, making it impossible to close positions smoothly. After weighing the options, I have decided to stay on the sidelines for now. The profit margin is too small, and the risks are too high to gamble. I will continue to review previous losses and prioritize prudence.