When it comes to payment and settlement, traditional financial networks are already quite mature. Clearing institutions like Visa and MasterCard can process tens of thousands of transactions per second, appearing to be unbreakable. However, the emergence of blockchain technology is rewriting these rules of the game in a whole new way.



So how big is the difference? While traditional networks handle large transaction volumes, the problem lies in settlement efficiency. Merchants have to wait to receive funds, with T+1 at best and T+2 at worst. This means it takes one to two days for funds to arrive. For retail merchants, cash flow delays directly impact their operational rhythm.

Blockchain-based public chain solutions offer an alternative possibility. TPS (transactions per second) can match that of traditional networks, and more importantly, achieve T+0 real-time settlement—funds arrive instantly and are immediately available. This immediacy in fund flow is almost revolutionary for small merchants.

Merchants no longer need to worry about the cash gap during waiting periods; their turnover efficiency is directly elevated. When technological means begin to address the core pain points of traditional finance, a forced efficiency revolution is already underway.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
LightningSentryvip
· 13h ago
T+0 seconds, this is true payment freedom. The traditional system that takes one or two days really drags down small merchants.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidatedDreamsvip
· 14h ago
T+0 sounds very appealing, but how much of it can actually be implemented? What are small merchants using now?
View OriginalReply0
DiamondHandsvip
· 14h ago
Instant arrival sounds good, but how difficult is it really to implement? Small merchants still have to consider volatility risks.
View OriginalReply0
MoonMathMagicvip
· 14h ago
T+0 seconds is truly amazing; small merchants' cash flow can finally breathe a sigh of relief.
View OriginalReply0
New_Ser_Ngmivip
· 14h ago
T+0 sounds good in theory, but in practice... Speaking of which, instant settlement is indeed a bit of a gimmick for small merchants, but how are gas fees and slippage calculated? Traditional finance may seem slow, but at least risks are controllable. On public chains... Let's wait until a public chain is truly stable and operational before boasting. Right now, it's all in the PPT stage. Small merchants lack cash flow the most, and this really hits the pain point. Visa and these guys should also have a sense of crisis; they'll be revolutionized sooner or later. The real test is regulation. Being technically impressive is useless.
View OriginalReply0
zkNoobvip
· 14h ago
T+0 seconds to arrive sounds impressive, but how many projects can actually implement it? Visa won't sit idly by.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-74b10196vip
· 14h ago
Instant arrival sounds great, but whether you can really use it depends on if you can afford the gas fees.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)