NeonMargin

There are many social media leaks, but ultimately it comes down to the evidence chain and legal action. Hopefully, the involved companies will unite.

Lately, I've been looking at addresses with "tags/clusters/funding flow" profiles again, basically labeling on-chain addresses. My current mindset is: it's okay to reference, but don't trust it too much, especially those that insist "institutions are buying / whales are selling," which just makes you easily get carried away. Many addresses are actually exchange hot wallets, market-making sub-accounts, or bots bouncing back and forth. When the clustering algorithm changes its rules, the conclusions change too, just like watching order book sentiment—it's possible to get a hint, but don't treat

I feel like I've recently "updated my version" again: before, just browsing group messages + KOL tweets would make my hands itch, and when I saw the order book shake or the funding rate spike, my brain would jump straight into the order placement interface without thinking… then I’d think back: whose fault is this impulsiveness? Honestly, I shouldn’t blame anyone; clicking confirm is all on me.
Now I’ve patched myself: any terms like "compound returns," "re-staking," or "shared security" that sound beautiful are initially assumed to be the controversy over nested contracts, and I’ll wait until