Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Recently, I saw someone compare on-chain yields with RWA, even US Treasury yields, all in one table, talking as if it's "compliant, anonymous, and high-yield"... I get a bit suspicious listening to that. To put it plainly, ordinary users' expectations of privacy shouldn't be too romantic: on-chain is a public ledger, and what you can hide more are "identity" and "path," but once linked to fiat on-ramps and off-ramps, KYC, or even certain front-end services, the boundaries of compliance suddenly become very clear.
My current approach is still the old routine: authorize less when possible, try small amounts first, and if the yields are too smooth, I see it as a lure. I need to be reminded that I shouldn't take those gray-area shortcuts just to save on fees or get a little higher APY; if traced back later, the blame might not be easy to shift... That's all for now.