Why does the global financial system actually need a third-party bridge currency mechanism?



This question cuts to the heart of modern liquidity infrastructure. The BIS perspective reveals something crucial about cross-chain settlement and tokenized asset flows. When you strip away the noise, it's about reducing friction between siloed ecosystems—whether traditional finance or decentralized networks. A neutral bridge currency layer enables better price discovery, faster settlement, and genuine interoperability that markets are increasingly demanding.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 3
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
UnluckyLemurvip
· 6h ago
To be honest, I've heard this set of logic about bridge coins too many times. How many of them are truly implementable?
View OriginalReply0
DecentralizeMevip
· 6h ago
Basically, it's about solving the problem of liquidity fragmentation, but a truly neutral bridging layer? I remain skeptical.
View OriginalReply0
All-InQueenvip
· 6h ago
Speaking of which, BIS's theory sounds impressive, but basically it's just trying to connect various ecosystems, right? The liquidity fragmentation is indeed severe, but I don't quite understand this "neutral" bridging coin... Who will guarantee that it is truly neutral?
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)