Gate Square “Creator Certification Incentive Program” — Recruiting Outstanding Creators!
Join now, share quality content, and compete for over $10,000 in monthly rewards.
How to Apply:
1️⃣ Open the App → Tap [Square] at the bottom → Click your [avatar] in the top right.
2️⃣ Tap [Get Certified], submit your application, and wait for approval.
Apply Now: https://www.gate.com/questionnaire/7159
Token rewards, exclusive Gate merch, and traffic exposure await you!
Details: https://www.gate.com/announcements/article/47889
After 100+ investments and probably 500-1000 founders pitching me, I can say this with confidence:
Tokenomics rarely tell you anything meaningful about the project.
But they tell you a lot about the founder.
• High FDV → ego & greed issues
• Dual equity/token structures → sees crypto as a cash grab
• Over-engineered vesting → low confidence in the product
• Massive airdrops → no real GTM, hype over longevity
• Over-engineered tokenomics → no product
I could go on with this list forever, but you get the point.
Well-designed tokenomics are nice to have, but almost never the reason a project succeeds.
A great product people actually want can survive terrible tokenomics.
The best tokenomics in the world will never save a useless product.
Unfortunately most founders confuse the two.