UK BRC Shop Price Index Year-on-Year for August

Today, ETH has fallen again; in fact, I think this fall is normal. After all, tonight there will be a huge pressure of 1.5 billion in the market wlfi. If a portion of the funds is to play with this WLFI, it is normal to temporarily sell some ETH. The recent trend of ETH has been mainly fluctuating, and there are two things the market needs to digest. One is WLFI, and the other is XPL. A market value of 30 billion, a market value of 8 billion.

Today, the Ethereum (ETH) market is once again showing a downward trend, but this may just be normal market fluctuation. The main challenge facing the current market comes from the upcoming WLFI project, which is expected to bring about 1.5 billion in sell pressure. Some investors, in order to participate in the WLFI project, have chosen to temporarily sell ETH to gain liquidity, a strategy that is understandable in the current market environment. Recently, the trend of Ethereum has been fluctuating, primarily influenced by two important factors: first, the WLFI project with a market cap of about 30 billion, and second, the XPL project with a market cap of about 8 billion. In the current market with limited funds, the funding demands of these emerging projects may impact the upward momentum of ETH. For the long positions established around 4300 previously, it is now possible to consider swing trading. In the future, one can continue to pay attention to buying opportunities in the 4300-4200 range, as such a strategy seems reasonable in the current market environment. In a situation where market funds are being diverted, the fluctuation adjustment may instead provide investors with opportunities to buy at low prices. However, investors need to carefully consider the timing of entry, exit strategies, and how to identify strong cryptocurrencies. At the same time, setting reasonable take-profit points is also an important part of risk management. Overall, in the current complex market environment, investors need to remain vigilant, closely monitor market trends, and develop suitable investment strategies based on their own risk tolerance.

The content below is all nonsense that I made up, not official information, all of which I fantasized! I see that someone is talking about the Monad public offering again; the rumors are powerful! According to previous statements, there are rumors that the Monad public offering will use the sonar platform. Many people may find this quite unfamiliar, but the plasma public sale actually used sonar, so there is speculation that the second project of sonar is Monad. echo and sonar are from the same company; echo focuses on deals with VC terms like angel rounds and seed rounds, while sonar specializes in public sales with 100% unlocked deals. It should be noted that although both use the same KYC system, echo does not require face authentication, while sonar has a chance of requiring a second face authentication before participating in the purchase. Don't ask me how I know; those who have used plasma probably have encountered this. Let me analyze the public offering again, it's most likely a situation of some sort. I guess it will be divided into 2 pools, one for guaranteed quota and the other for oversubscription. As everyone knows, oversubscription means anyone can participate, here we are talking about the guaranteed quota. If there is a guaranteed amount, I have a few guesses. 1. Community roles, the level of community roles represents different limits, with the lowest level being those who possess the fa role. 2. Recently, the monad card may also have a limit associated with owning the card. Observant individuals have noticed that the description of each person's card is also different, which suggests that there are different tiers, and the limits for different tiers should also vary. 3. The card in the community section will, without a doubt, have a level classification. However, it is unclear whether this classification will be based on the roles in the community or based on the number of YES received by everyone in the recognizer. Different levels correspond to different limits. This guess has overlapping parts, but I ultimately lean towards the idea that everyone's limits are determined based on the card they receive.

Recently, there have been significant changes in the airdrop activities in the cryptocurrency field. From the initial testnet interactions and simple tasks, it has gradually evolved into complex activities that require actual funds to participate. This trend indicates that the second half of the year may become a golden period for stablecoins. Multiple projects are beginning to require participants to deposit a certain amount of assets or stablecoins. For example, Infinex requires at least $250 in assets to participate in the card game; new projects on the Kaito platform such as Billions and Boundless also need substantial capital investment; the CDL project of Fourmeme requires a pledge of $4000 in stablecoins; Lombard Finance has a minimum participation threshold of $200. Other projects like Gaib, dzSOL, and Noble have similar funding requirements, and some even affect participants' points based on the duration of the deposit. The Plasma project requires a 60-day fixed deposit of stablecoins on the Binance platform. This trend indicates that Airdrop activities are shifting towards "capital games." Participants with more capital tend to have more opportunities, while free participation chances are decreasing. However, this does not mean the disappearance of opportunities, but rather a change in the rules of the game. In this ever-evolving environment, participants need to adapt to new rules and find ways to engage that suit them. Although the barriers to entry are rising, opportunities still exist for those who can flexibly adjust their strategies. It is important to recognize that although the rules of the game are changing, the core remains finding the right entry point for oneself. In this era dominated by stablecoins, flexibility and strategic thinking will be the key factors for success.

Recently, the Crypto Assets market has shown a fluctuating trend. The price of Bitcoin has declined, and alts have generally followed the fall. This trend is partly attributed to MicroStrategy's financing plan not meeting expectations, and its decision to restart common stock issuance contradicting previous commitments has severely undermined market confidence. At the same time, the U.S. stock market is also showing a downward trend, with the Nasdaq index performing worse than small-cap stocks. In terms of project dynamics, a point of significant interest is that the Trump family related project WLFI is set to unlock on September 1st, with a circulation ratio of 3.7% and a total market value of up to 30 billion USD. It is worth mentioning that the lending protocol DOLO has benefited due to its founder also serving as the CTO of WLFI, leading to a substantial increase in its stock price. DOLO also provides lending support for USD1. The stablecoin public chain XPL performed brilliantly in pre-market trading, with a market capitalization surpassing 9 billion USD. At the same time, the public chain IP launched a buyback plan worth 82 million USD, attracting investors' attention. In terms of emerging projects, the on-chain credit scoring platform CreditLink conducted its first fundraising on the MEME launch platform FOUR, successfully raising $250 million and attracting participation from 80,000 addresses. The platform supports payments using USD1, demonstrating a good application prospect. Overall, despite the pressure on mainstream Crypto Assets, emerging projects and specific sectors still demonstrate vitality, reflecting the diversified development trend of the crypto market.