Fabric’s construction of something that reverses the script of whoever benefits in automation.

Robotics is currently a closed game. All the value, the hardware, the software, the revenue, goes to the companies that own the robots. Everyone else just watches. Such a model used to be reasonable when robots were a costly novelty. They cannot have sense when they are going to be everywhere.

@FabricFND is making an open network in which that dynamic is modifiable. The concept is simple, anyone can become part of the deploying, coordinating, and implementing robots into the real-life conditions - and make money on it. You do not have to be up to your neck in creating robot company.

The network is constructed on the basis of the centrality of the value flow through the system, which is the center of the network, $ROBO . In the event that the robots accomplish legitimate assignments, the incentives pass through the protocol. Those people who aid in the coordination or deployment of such robots get a share. It is a new form of workforce, the workers are now machines and the people who gain do not necessarily have to be corporations.

What is even more than an interesting idea is the infrastructure behind it. Fabric relies on onchain coordination and Proof of Robotic Work to ensure that something really occurred and then it can start paying out anything. That's not a small detail. This is what makes an open network confident. Not verifying you do not have a protocol, you have promises.

The robot economy being pointed to by the long-term picture Fabric is a genuinely distributed one. Not controlled by a few tech giants, but being distributed among a broad network of actors some of them are running nodes, some are deploying hardware, some are simply holding and staking #ROBO . Every piece contributes to a system which becomes more useful with each addition.

Automation is here no matter. The actual question is to whom it benefits.