The biggest problem with Jupiter right now is how governance works.


Proposals can appear out of thin air, without real community input in the design phase.
You’re voting on what the Jup team decides to put in front of you, structured the way they want it structured.
This is still not a DAO, this is a voting layer.
On top of that, the rules keep changing.
-No clear framework.
-No stable governance process.
-No long-term guarantees for stakers.
What’s offered today can be easily modified tomorrow.
This creates massive governance risk.
In traditional systems this is called policy uncertainty.
And don’t get me wrong, Jupiter has built insanely good products. But changes need to be done; without clear procedures investors can’t feel confident buying.
JUP-2,71%
post-image
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
No comments
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)