Mike Novogratz's controversial investor performance has once again sparked debates in crypto circles. Recently, influential community members have questioned why investors continue to trust him with their capital, given his history of decisions that have been controversial. The issue raises a deeper question: how do opinion leaders maintain their influence when their investment track record shows questionable results? This reflection highlights the tensions within the crypto ecosystem, where the reputation and credibility of prominent figures are often scrutinized. The community seems to be critically reevaluating who deserves their trust and based on what criteria, especially considering the impact these decisions have on their own portfolios.

View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
No comments
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)