Nasdaq applies to the SEC: Lift the 25,000 position limit on Bitcoin and Ethereum ETF options

SignatureVerifier · 2026-01-23T03:58:10+00:00

Nasdaq submits rule change application to the SEC to eliminate the 25,000 position limit on spot Bitcoin and Ethereum ETF options, aiming to achieve fair treatment for crypto ETF options compared to other commodity options. The SEC has initiated a public comment period and is expected to make a decision by the end of February. This move could bring more trading opportunities and liquidity.

SignatureVerifier

2026-01-23 03:58:10

Abstract generation in progress

【Blockchain Rhythm】Breaking news, Nasdaq has just submitted a rule change application to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). What is the core content of this application? It is to eliminate the 25,000 position limit on spot Bitcoin and Ethereum ETF options.

Why do this? Nasdaq’s idea is straightforward—align crypto ETF options with other commodity options. Think about it, currently crypto ETF options are restricted individually, while other commodity options are not, which is obviously unfair. This application aims to eliminate this disparity.

Good news is, the SEC has opened a comment period, and a final decision is expected to be made by the end of February. This could mean more trading space and liquidity for the entire crypto derivatives market.

BTC0,38%

ETH0,21%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

6 Likes

Reward
6
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

gas_fee_therapy

· 18h ago

Finally, someone is fighting for fair treatment for crypto. These restrictions are really outrageous. It's the same old story. By the time the SEC approves, the opportunity might be gone. End of February? I bet five candies this will be delayed until spring. This is the way it should be. Why should crypto be treated differently? It seems like institutions are quietly paving the way. I need to pay more attention to this.

View OriginalReply0

AlgoAlchemist

· 18h ago

Finally, someone dares to challenge this unfair restriction. The 25,000 cap should have been removed long ago.

View OriginalReply0

faded_wojak.eth