【CoinPush】Regarding whether Bitcoin can surge from $90,000 to $150,000, analysts in the industry have differing opinions.
Macro researcher Luke Gromen recently poured cold water on the idea. His view is straightforward: without significant market catalysts, institutional investors are unlikely to chase prices proactively this year. Institutions tend to be very cautious; they won’t enter blindly when event-driven signals are unclear. According to his analysis, the key variables that could move this market include the progress of the US CLARITY Act and whether the Federal Reserve continues to cut interest rates.
But Luke also warns of risks. In extreme scenarios, such as a full-scale trade war or economic recession, Bitcoin could retrace to $60,000, at which point publicly listed companies holding BTC might be forced to reduce their holdings.
Switching gears, CryptoQuant CEO Ki Young Ju provided a completely different signal. He cited data indicating that institutional demand is actually quite active—over the past year, institutions have accumulated a total of 577,000 BTC, roughly worth $53 billion. The implication behind this figure is that large funds have not exited but are continuing to build positions. Grayscale also previously expressed similar views, believing that institutional entry and clearer regulatory policies are the true drivers behind Bitcoin’s new highs.
So the current situation is somewhat delicate: on one side, concerns about a lack of short-term catalysts; on the other, the fact that institutions are continuously accumulating. Which logic will prove more convincing? The market will provide the answer.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ZkProofPudding
· 6h ago
Institutions are really lazy. Without an event-driven trigger, they just won't move. That's the real truth... When will the CLARITY Act actually be implemented?
View OriginalReply0
wrekt_but_learning
· 6h ago
Are institutions really cautious? I think it's just that there aren't enough positive signals. CLARITY hasn't even been implemented yet, and they're already hyping it up to 150,000. Dream on.
---
Luke's warning this time isn't unfounded. The 60,000 bottom line is indeed frightening, but it seems like Ki Young Ju definitely has data to support a bullish outlook. These two always argue with each other haha.
---
Honestly, it's still lacking a catalyst. Relying solely on institutions to hype isn't interesting; it depends on the Federal Reserve's stance.
---
If a trade war really happens, will the crypto market be a safe haven or sink together? That's the real question.
---
And what about Ki Young Ju's data? Was the content cut off? It seems like he's probably going to talk again about how strong on-chain data is.
View OriginalReply0
FlashLoanLarry
· 6h ago
ngl, luke's just describing the classic institutional patience play—waiting for basis points to align before deploying real capital. but ki young ju probably has the on-chain data that actually matters here, so... who's really reading the tea leaves correctly? 👀
Reply0
GreenCandleCollector
· 6h ago
Are institutions really cautious? I don't think so... This is just an excuse for big players to accumulate, claiming a lack of catalysts on the surface, but secretly hoarding coins.
Luke's predictions are incredibly strong this time. 60,000 sounds impressive, but I can't bet on it.
What about Ki Young Ju's data? Just keeping us in suspense?
Saying "wait for a catalyst" is the same as not saying anything... Can we really wait for something like the CLARITY Act? The coin has already flown away.
Institutions don't chase highs? Ha, you'll know they regret it when they are forced to buy the dip.
150,000 is just a dream, but at least it won't be like Luna... Hopefully.
Are institutions really driving up Bitcoin? Analysts' opinions clash—one bullish, one warning.
【CoinPush】Regarding whether Bitcoin can surge from $90,000 to $150,000, analysts in the industry have differing opinions.
Macro researcher Luke Gromen recently poured cold water on the idea. His view is straightforward: without significant market catalysts, institutional investors are unlikely to chase prices proactively this year. Institutions tend to be very cautious; they won’t enter blindly when event-driven signals are unclear. According to his analysis, the key variables that could move this market include the progress of the US CLARITY Act and whether the Federal Reserve continues to cut interest rates.
But Luke also warns of risks. In extreme scenarios, such as a full-scale trade war or economic recession, Bitcoin could retrace to $60,000, at which point publicly listed companies holding BTC might be forced to reduce their holdings.
Switching gears, CryptoQuant CEO Ki Young Ju provided a completely different signal. He cited data indicating that institutional demand is actually quite active—over the past year, institutions have accumulated a total of 577,000 BTC, roughly worth $53 billion. The implication behind this figure is that large funds have not exited but are continuing to build positions. Grayscale also previously expressed similar views, believing that institutional entry and clearer regulatory policies are the true drivers behind Bitcoin’s new highs.
So the current situation is somewhat delicate: on one side, concerns about a lack of short-term catalysts; on the other, the fact that institutions are continuously accumulating. Which logic will prove more convincing? The market will provide the answer.