The TPS Obsession Nobody Talks About



Why are we still chasing six-figure TPS numbers? Here's the reality: the ecosystem's actual settlement throughput sits comfortably under 80 TPS. The race beyond that? It's padding the specs sheet, not solving real problems.

Anything exceeding genuine demand becomes bloat—performance theater masquerading as innovation. When infrastructure scales beyond what the network actually needs to settle, you're optimizing for vanity metrics, not functionality.

Focus on what matters: stability, security, and matching real-world throughput requirements. That's where the actual value lives.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
TokenomicsPolicevip
· 8h ago
To put it simply, the TPS numbers are a digital game that should have gone bankrupt long ago. Many projects boast about millions of TPS, but they're just lying. The actual needed is just over 80, and the rest are just fancy PowerPoint presentations.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeBarbecuevip
· 8h ago
Basically, those who brag about TPS numbers are just fooling themselves. 80 is enough, but they insist on claiming 1 million.
View OriginalReply0
Fren_Not_Foodvip
· 8h ago
Honestly, I'm tired of the TPS number games; there are only a few that are truly usable.
View OriginalReply0
AlwaysQuestioningvip
· 8h ago
Hearing this, I just think of those projects that boast about their TPS all day long... And the result? Less than 80 actually usable, hilarious.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)