2026-01-15 06:27:23

The beauty of Verse_Eight lies in dissolving the artificial boundary between creator and player—two roles that shouldn't have existed as separate entities in the first place.

Here's what sets it apart: every action that matters gets recorded and woven into your identity within the ecosystem. Playing a game? Creating one? Remixing another builder's world? Contributing back to the community? It all counts. There's no gatekeeping, no hierarchical ladder where players sit below creators.

This is identity as experience. Your participation history becomes your proof of contribution. Whether you're designing, playing, iterating on someone else's work, or strengthening the entire network—each action reinforces who you are in this world. UX flows from this philosophy: the system shouldn't ask "are you a creator or a player?" anymore. You just exist, you build, you play, and the world remembers.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

15 Likes

Reward
15
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

SleepTrader

· 12h ago

This idea has some substance. Finally, someone has brought creators and players, these sworn enemies, together. The key to breaking the shell is to make sure whatever you do is remembered—whether you're playing or creating, it all counts. This feels more like what Web3 should be—no more dividing people into tiers or classes.

View OriginalReply0

SerumDegen

· 01-15 06:57

ngl this hits different... no more artificial leverage separating roles? that's the cascade effect we've been waiting for. every action as on-chain signal to your actual identity. finally someone building it right instead of just talking about it

Reply0

P2ENotWorking

· 01-15 06:54

This setup sounds ideal, but I just want to ask... can it really be done? --- Another project that dissolves binary opposition, the story is quite beautiful, but how about the actual implementation? --- We've heard many times that player creators are treated equally, but the key still depends on how the token distribution is handled. --- Identity as experience... sounds like gamifying participation, but honestly, I can't tell how long this logic can last. --- Cancel gatekeeping? Then who will still be excited to "build" after the token price crashes? --- Some substance here, finally someone thought of this point. --- Reminds me of those projects that once claimed to break the hierarchy... what happened to them later? --- Wait, does this mean all operations are recorded on-chain? What about privacy? Or do they simply not care? --- Remixing others' content also counts as contribution. You need to understand this rule clearly, or else it will just be copy-paste.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidationHunter

· 01-15 06:49

Someone finally said it: the dichotomy between creators and players is forcibly separated. Having fun while playing is also creating; there's no need to label it. This is what Web3 should look like—every step you take is recorded, no pretenses.

View OriginalReply0

DegenWhisperer

· 01-15 06:30

Damn, this is what true Web3 should look like --- The line between creators and players should have disappeared long ago. Finally, there's a project daring to do this --- Is identity equal to experience? Damn, I love this logic --- No need to worry about whether you're a creator or a player... simple and straightforward, I like it --- Behavior records are proof of identity—pretty hardcore idea --- Breaking the hierarchy system really hit me... I'm tired, I don't want to be stratified anymore --- All participation counts, including remixing others' works? Now that's real inclusiveness --- Experience is identity. It sounds a bit虚, but actually implementing it feels the most real --- Finally, I don't have to ask stupid questions like "Am I a creator?" --- Turning participation history into proof of contribution... that's what Web3 should be about

View OriginalReply0