Weekly trading frequency matters more than you think—especially when fees stack up.
Picture this: you're placing $1,000 trades consistently, breaking even on each one. Sounds neutral, right? Wrong.
Hit a 1% fee structure? Here's what actually gets eaten:
• 1-10 trades weekly → $54 in losses • 10-25 trades weekly → $161 in losses • 25-50 trades weekly → fees multiply fast
That's not a small thing. You're not losing money on trades—you're bleeding it through the platform's commission. The more active you trade, the deeper the hole gets.
This is why choosing a low-fee exchange or optimizing your bot's strategy matters. Every trade carries a hidden tax. Scale up your volume without addressing fee structure, and you're essentially paying to lose breakeven status.
The math doesn't lie: passive holding beats hyperactive trading when fees are involved.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
Weekly trading frequency matters more than you think—especially when fees stack up.
Picture this: you're placing $1,000 trades consistently, breaking even on each one. Sounds neutral, right? Wrong.
Hit a 1% fee structure? Here's what actually gets eaten:
• 1-10 trades weekly → $54 in losses
• 10-25 trades weekly → $161 in losses
• 25-50 trades weekly → fees multiply fast
That's not a small thing. You're not losing money on trades—you're bleeding it through the platform's commission. The more active you trade, the deeper the hole gets.
This is why choosing a low-fee exchange or optimizing your bot's strategy matters. Every trade carries a hidden tax. Scale up your volume without addressing fee structure, and you're essentially paying to lose breakeven status.
The math doesn't lie: passive holding beats hyperactive trading when fees are involved.