Take a look at how much the performance of U.S. stocks has varied over the past five years: only 19 S&P 500 components have declined more than 50%, while on the other end, 135 stocks have doubled in value. The market has become so polarized that the performance of different sectors is essentially two different worlds. For those focused on global asset allocation, this data really highlights the issue — not all stocks can keep pace with the overall market.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
5 Likes
Reward
5
3
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
LightningPacketLoss
· 8h ago
That's why I hold tightly onto those certain 135, I really don't care about the others.
View OriginalReply0
rug_connoisseur
· 8h ago
Oh my, this polarization is just too outrageous. Winners eat meat, losers drink soup, it's that simple and brutal.
View OriginalReply0
ProtocolRebel
· 9h ago
Damn, that's why I would never dare to go all-in on a certain sector.
Take a look at how much the performance of U.S. stocks has varied over the past five years: only 19 S&P 500 components have declined more than 50%, while on the other end, 135 stocks have doubled in value. The market has become so polarized that the performance of different sectors is essentially two different worlds. For those focused on global asset allocation, this data really highlights the issue — not all stocks can keep pace with the overall market.