The crypto industry's paradox: we're not asking for no rules, we want sensible regulation—the kind that doesn't strangle innovation while still protecting users. Light-touch oversight that makes sense, not bureaucratic overkill masquerading as compliance.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
16 Likes
Reward
16
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
BlockchainTherapist
· 15h ago
That's true, but what about reality? Regulators simply won't listen.
View OriginalReply0
SurvivorshipBias
· 15h ago
That's right, it's about finding a balance point, not implementing a one-size-fits-all approach that could kill the entire industry.
View OriginalReply0
PriceOracleFairy
· 15h ago
nah see the thing is... "light-touch" is such a statistical anomaly rn. nobody actually knows what that means until the sec decides to redefine it at 3am on a friday lol. market inefficiency at its finest, tbh.
Reply0
LightningWallet
· 15h ago
I'm just worried that regulators won't listen at all, sticking to the old methods, and ultimately killing the entire industry.
View OriginalReply0
GrayscaleArbitrageur
· 15h ago
Someone finally said it: really, stop messing around with those bloated and innovation-killing things.
The crypto industry's paradox: we're not asking for no rules, we want sensible regulation—the kind that doesn't strangle innovation while still protecting users. Light-touch oversight that makes sense, not bureaucratic overkill masquerading as compliance.