A major exchange leader has publicly opposed the current Senate Banking Committee's cryptocurrency bill, stating the proposed regulatory framework falls short of industry standards. The executive emphasized that the organization would prefer legislative inaction over adopting poorly designed regulations that could hamper market development and innovation.



This stance reflects growing tensions between crypto platforms and policymakers over how to structure banking regulations for digital assets. The disagreement centers on specific provisions within the proposed bill that industry players argue may create compliance burdens without achieving meaningful consumer protection.

The position underscores the ongoing debate about regulatory approaches in the U.S. crypto market, where stakeholders continue advocating for balanced policies that address oversight concerns while supporting technological advancement and market maturity.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 8
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
NFTArtisanHQvip
· 12h ago
ngl, the whole "no regulation is better than bad regulation" thing feels like we're stuck in this aesthetic dead-end, know? like, deconstructing the regulatory narrative through a post-digital lens... it's just another form of creative gatekeeping disguised as market protection. the irony of demanding sovereignty while dodging actual governance frameworks is *chef's kiss* problematic.
Reply0
CountdownToBrokevip
· 14h ago
Nah, this is just ridiculous. The exchange insists on clashing with the Senate... Instead of messing around with these lousy regulations, it's better to do nothing at all, really.
View OriginalReply0
BTCWaveRidervip
· 14h ago
NGL, these exchanges are starting to shift the blame again, saying the bill design is not good. I think they just don't want to be regulated. Is compliance really that difficult?
View OriginalReply0
MEVictimvip
· 14h ago
I can't agree. These politicians don't understand Web3 at all. Instead of messing things up, it's better not to get involved.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoGoldminevip
· 14h ago
Rather than forcibly imposing unsuitable constraints, it's better to maintain the current situation for now. I understand this logic. From the growth curve of the computing power network, the regulatory vacuum period is actually a good time for strategic deployment.
View OriginalReply0
ForumLurkervip
· 14h ago
Instead of passing these half-baked bills, it's better to do nothing. Anyway, the big players just want to block us.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeTherapistvip
· 14h ago
NGL, this bill design is really terrible. Exchanges would rather do nothing than get stuck by such crappy regulations... It's truly regulation for the sake of regulation.
View OriginalReply0
ZKProofEnthusiastvip
· 14h ago
It's really better not to regulate at all than to have half-hearted regulation.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)