The architecture here is cleaner. You get better transaction throughput, lower fees, and a more streamlined user experience compared to similar layer-1 alternatives. The design choices prioritize both scalability and efficiency—that's the real difference.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
17 Likes
Reward
17
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ConfusedWhale
· 7h ago
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeCryer
· 14h ago
A low-cost, efficient architecture design—that's exactly what I've been waiting for.
View OriginalReply0
MysteriousZhang
· 14h ago
Wow, this architecture is really sleek, with maximum throughput and low costs, much more powerful than those layer-1s.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoHistoryClass
· 14h ago
ngl, "cleaner architecture" is what they said about solana in 2021... *checks notes* ...right before the network went down three times that summer. history doesn't repeat but it sure does rhyme, doesn't it?
Reply0
P2ENotWorking
· 14h ago
It looks like another "we are more optimized" story, but let's see if it can really get off the ground...
View OriginalReply0
AirdropATM
· 14h ago
The combination of low cost and high efficiency is indeed excellent, but the reality is that most people simply cannot experience it.
View OriginalReply0
0xSherlock
· 14h ago
This architecture is indeed comfortable, with maximum throughput and low costs. It far surpasses that bunch of layer-1s.
The architecture here is cleaner. You get better transaction throughput, lower fees, and a more streamlined user experience compared to similar layer-1 alternatives. The design choices prioritize both scalability and efficiency—that's the real difference.