Here's my take: skip $MSTR if you want to avoid extra baggage. Going straight Bitcoin keeps things simple - you're not layering on unnecessary risk. Sure, $MSTR might rip during a bull run and go absolutely parabolic, completely untethered from fundamentals. That's possible. But it's not guaranteed, and frankly, that kind of upside doesn't compensate for the volatility you're taking on. Sometimes the simplest play is the best one.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
TideReceder
· 21h ago
Buying Bitcoin directly is more convenient. Why bother with stocks of companies like MSTR?
View OriginalReply0
GasWrangler
· 21h ago
ngl the whole "simplicity = best" argument is demonstrably sub-optimal if you actually analyze the data. mstr's correlation patterns tell a different story than what you're pushing here, technically speaking.
Reply0
CountdownToBroke
· 21h ago
Isn't it better to just buy BTC directly? Why make it so complicated?
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeCrying
· 21h ago
Buying BTC directly is hassle-free; the leverage risk of MSTR is really not worth it.
Here's my take: skip $MSTR if you want to avoid extra baggage. Going straight Bitcoin keeps things simple - you're not layering on unnecessary risk. Sure, $MSTR might rip during a bull run and go absolutely parabolic, completely untethered from fundamentals. That's possible. But it's not guaranteed, and frankly, that kind of upside doesn't compensate for the volatility you're taking on. Sometimes the simplest play is the best one.