Back when Zera peaked before, things were messy—no clear roadmap, scattered info floating around, pure privacy narrative hype driving the buying frenzy. Pretty different now. This cycle, people can actually see the development progress and understand what's being constructed. That's exactly why holders are sticking around longer—average holding period sitting above 3 months speaks volumes. When you've got real visibility into what's being built, people stop panic-selling at the first dip. Billions in potential here.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
18 Likes
Reward
18
3
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
AlwaysMissingTops
· 16h ago
The increased transparency definitely makes a difference, but what can a 3-month holding period really indicate? During a bull market, anyone can hold on.
View OriginalReply0
TokenDustCollector
· 16h ago
Really, this time it's different. Transparency helps stabilize people's confidence.
View OriginalReply0
SatoshiChallenger
· 16h ago
Do the data really show that a 3-month holding period can explain the issue? The previous project that argued this has now gone to zero [cold laugh]
Back when Zera peaked before, things were messy—no clear roadmap, scattered info floating around, pure privacy narrative hype driving the buying frenzy. Pretty different now. This cycle, people can actually see the development progress and understand what's being constructed. That's exactly why holders are sticking around longer—average holding period sitting above 3 months speaks volumes. When you've got real visibility into what's being built, people stop panic-selling at the first dip. Billions in potential here.