It seems that the crypto community's resentment towards certain opinion leaders is intensifying. What is the core issue? Too much false content flooding the information stream, with KOLs only thinking about how to boost their presence and monetize, neglecting authenticity. When someone starts to tear down this facade and expose these false glories, it naturally invites complaints. To be honest, this cleanup process is beneficial for the long-term health of the platform. Genuine discussions, real data, and authentic community voices are the foundation for the platform's sustainability. Filtering out those watered-down contents can actually attract more quality participants.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ProposalDetective
· 7h ago
It was about time to clear it out; the bubbles inflated by these KOLs should have been burst long ago.
View OriginalReply0
HodlAndChill
· 7h ago
It's about time for a big cleanup. These KOLs hyping up and fooling newbies every day are getting tiresome.
---
Getting called out for exposing false prosperity and then getting attacked? It clearly hits a nerve, haha.
---
Instead of criticizing, it's better to focus on finding real signals and not be hijacked by watered-down content.
---
Yeah, the cleaner the platform, the more it can attract serious users. Trash KOLs getting kicked out is actually a good thing.
---
This round of adjustment is like a reverse operation of harvesting leeks; it hurts but is beneficial in the long run.
---
The bubble will eventually be burst; better to burst it early than late. It's not too late to start now.
---
Authenticity > Popularity. This concept is extremely scarce in crypto.
---
Those KOLs who only blow up orders should have been removed long ago. Occupying information space is a real waste.
---
Suddenly I realize, a quality community is worth much more than a popularity community.
---
Wait, will those accounts living off false narratives turn against each other collectively?
View OriginalReply0
MEVvictim
· 7h ago
I'm already tired of these KOLs' routines, they just boast and harvest the little guys every day.
View OriginalReply0
BackrowObserver
· 7h ago
Haha, finally someone dares to say this. I'm already tired of these KOL tricks.
---
But to be honest, these inflated accounts on X really need to be cleaned up, or else new users will be flooded with spam.
---
Wow, this article hit a nerve. The most painful part is that phrase "boosting presence and monetization."
---
I fully support cleaning up fake content, but I don't know when it will actually be implemented.
---
Wait, are you talking about a specific KOL? Can you name them? I want to see the show.
---
Genuine quality discussions are indeed rare; most are just echo chambers of marketing accounts.
---
The question is, who will define what "authentic" means? Could it lead to new monopolies instead?
---
I just want to know if the onlookers will eventually truly gravitate toward quality communities.
---
You're right, but execution is difficult. Interest groups won't willingly give up their say.
It seems that the crypto community's resentment towards certain opinion leaders is intensifying. What is the core issue? Too much false content flooding the information stream, with KOLs only thinking about how to boost their presence and monetize, neglecting authenticity. When someone starts to tear down this facade and expose these false glories, it naturally invites complaints. To be honest, this cleanup process is beneficial for the long-term health of the platform. Genuine discussions, real data, and authentic community voices are the foundation for the platform's sustainability. Filtering out those watered-down contents can actually attract more quality participants.