Recently, an interesting phenomenon has been observed—those popular memes promoted by leading exchanges are still holding on, but most of the other tokens that recently exploded have basically returned to the starting point. To be honest, I think exchanges should establish a clearer standard system for projects on the BSC chain. With explicit requirement indicators, projects will know how much effort they need to put in, when they can list on the contract, and when they can go live, rather than everyone groping in the dark.
Doing so is actually good for the ecosystem—it can protect investors and provide project teams with a clear roadmap. Instead of everyone exploring blindly in the dark, it's better to make the game rules transparent.
So I’m also curious—among these popular tokens recently, which ones do you think are likely to successfully list on the contract or spot trading? And what about tokens like DOYR?
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
StakeHouseDirector
· 20h ago
Exchanges doing this are just trying to cut leeks; no matter how transparent the rules are, they can't withstand the market makers dumping the price.
Honestly, it still depends on who has backing behind the scenes. No matter how regulated small projects are, it's useless.
I directly ignore projects like DOYR; no matter how hard they push, they can't be saved.
In this wave of market conditions, those who survive will all depend on the mood of the secondary market.
View OriginalReply0
BloodInStreets
· 21h ago
The exchange's main promotion of meme coins is just to boost their own profile, and retail investors are the ones left holding the bag... Standard systems? That's a joke in the crypto world; everyone knows it's just about利益输送.
Thinking in reverse, the more transparent the rules are, the easier they are to be manipulated. Now, this black box system actually preserves the opportunity for bottom-fishing.
DOYR? I don't see anything special; it's about to be cut in half again.
Projects that can succeed don't need to wait for rules; they inherently have the appeal of blood fundraising.
View OriginalReply0
governance_lurker
· 21h ago
Bro, your idea is too idealistic. Exchanges are not charity organizations; clear standards might actually cut off their revenue streams.
Wait, does DOYR still have people asking questions? I already sold all my holdings long ago, haha.
Honestly, it's still driven by interests. Lack of transparency is actually a consensus among some project teams and exchanges.
How many projects have died in this round? Feels like a lot of scam coins have been cleaned out.
How deep are the capital behind those few meme coins that are still holding on? Why are they the only ones surviving?
Transparency in rules sounds good, but when it actually happens, people find loopholes. Better to keep things as they are... uh, actually, it's pretty chaotic.
You guys are still chasing new coins? I'm just watching the overall market trend now.
BSC stuff is too complicated; honestly, it's better not to touch it.
View OriginalReply0
MentalWealthHarvester
· 21h ago
Exchanges are so tight, there's no room for small coins anymore, better stick to the top few for safety.
A standard system is a good idea, but the problem is... exchanges simply don't want transparency.
DOYR? Don't even mention it, I'm already numb.
Nine out of the ten hottest projects recently are all just schemes to harvest retail investors.
Instead of waiting for standards, it's better to learn how to read the charts yourself and not be fooled by mainstream promotions.
By the way, Bitcoin has dropped again, sector rotation is too fast, can't keep up with the rhythm.
That's why I only buy the top ten by market cap now, just for peace of mind.
Meme coins look lively, but they're basically just a playground for big players.
Transparency? Haha, is that even called an exchange?
Projects on the BSC chain are mostly just for harvesting, not worth expecting much.
Once a standard system arrives, it might kill off a bunch of projects—who wants that?
We are just retail investors, don't expect any rules.
View OriginalReply0
MetaMaskVictim
· 21h ago
The main meme promoted by the exchange is the one that survives, everything else is dead. The difference is just too stark. To put it simply, there are no rules, it's all based on personal preference.
Recently, an interesting phenomenon has been observed—those popular memes promoted by leading exchanges are still holding on, but most of the other tokens that recently exploded have basically returned to the starting point. To be honest, I think exchanges should establish a clearer standard system for projects on the BSC chain. With explicit requirement indicators, projects will know how much effort they need to put in, when they can list on the contract, and when they can go live, rather than everyone groping in the dark.
Doing so is actually good for the ecosystem—it can protect investors and provide project teams with a clear roadmap. Instead of everyone exploring blindly in the dark, it's better to make the game rules transparent.
So I’m also curious—among these popular tokens recently, which ones do you think are likely to successfully list on the contract or spot trading? And what about tokens like DOYR?