Tokenization of real-world assets has become a definitive trend in the blockchain industry. In this trillion-dollar track, some projects are seizing strategic high ground through differentiated strategies.
Among them, the most noteworthy are those who understand both technology and compliance. For example, certain projects collaborate deeply with legitimate exchanges holding financial licenses, directly ensuring the compliance of securities tokenization from the source. This "tech team + licensed institution" model significantly reduces risks associated with policy uncertainty—an irresistible attraction for institutional investors.
Geographically, the European market has become a battleground. Compared to other regions, Europe has a relatively complete and clear regulatory framework, providing these projects ample space to build blockchain securities infrastructure. Whoever can take an early lead in this blue ocean will hold the future discourse power.
On the technical level? Truly visionary projects won't chase generic smart contract platform concepts but will precisely target the core needs of on-chain financial assets—privacy protection, second-level settlement, and automated compliance execution. All these capabilities are indispensable.
As traditional financial assets enter the blockchain world on a large scale, the market's demand for such underlying protocols will only grow more urgent. Projects currently laying out are preparing for a future explosion.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
16 Likes
Reward
16
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
OffchainOracle
· 16h ago
European license + technology, this combination is indeed powerful, but how many will actually make it to that day?
View OriginalReply0
ETH_Maxi_Taxi
· 16h ago
European compliance licenses are really valuable; institutions rely on them. But to be honest, whether they can truly survive depends on how solid their tech stack is.
View OriginalReply0
OnchainHolmes
· 16h ago
Europe is indeed securing their position, but the real profit still depends on who can crack the compliance deadlock.
Sounds good, but I'm just worried it might be another PPT wealth creation.
In terms of second-level settlement, there are only a few projects with real prospects.
The combination of compliance and technology is indeed rare, but institutions will have to wait a bit longer to enter.
It feels like those currently planning are betting on the future; how many will survive until then?
Europe's framework is well-established, but what about tax issues? Who will solve that?
I trust the technology, but I always feel something's off with the compliance part.
I've heard about trillion-dollar tracks too many times; still, let's see the real implementation.
Privacy + settlement + automatic compliance—can all three be achieved simultaneously?
View OriginalReply0
AirdropDreamer
· 16h ago
A combination of European compliance + licensing agencies, this is indeed a new approach. Institutional buy-in makes a big difference.
---
Real-time settlement, automated compliance... sounds good, but how many can actually achieve it?
---
The RWA track is hot, but we're worried it might just be another wave of hype. Who is truly implementing it?
---
For those now entering the European market, let's wait and see when regulations tighten.
---
Technology + licensing sounds perfect, but in reality, can these two really work seamlessly together?
---
Privacy protection and compliance enforcement are inherently contradictory. How do they balance it?
---
Everyone wants a piece of the trillion-dollar track, but probably only a few will survive in the end.
---
European blue ocean... why do I feel it's not so blue anymore?
---
Visionary projects vs. funded projects—are these often inversely related? Haha.
---
It's called preparing for a big breakout, but in reality, it's just running to raise funds.
View OriginalReply0
Degentleman
· 16h ago
The European side is indeed competitive, but there are very few licensed exchanges willing to cooperate deeply with projects.
Tokenization of real-world assets has become a definitive trend in the blockchain industry. In this trillion-dollar track, some projects are seizing strategic high ground through differentiated strategies.
Among them, the most noteworthy are those who understand both technology and compliance. For example, certain projects collaborate deeply with legitimate exchanges holding financial licenses, directly ensuring the compliance of securities tokenization from the source. This "tech team + licensed institution" model significantly reduces risks associated with policy uncertainty—an irresistible attraction for institutional investors.
Geographically, the European market has become a battleground. Compared to other regions, Europe has a relatively complete and clear regulatory framework, providing these projects ample space to build blockchain securities infrastructure. Whoever can take an early lead in this blue ocean will hold the future discourse power.
On the technical level? Truly visionary projects won't chase generic smart contract platform concepts but will precisely target the core needs of on-chain financial assets—privacy protection, second-level settlement, and automated compliance execution. All these capabilities are indispensable.
As traditional financial assets enter the blockchain world on a large scale, the market's demand for such underlying protocols will only grow more urgent. Projects currently laying out are preparing for a future explosion.