The true value of any technology ultimately depends on what applications it can empower. A certain privacy public chain, through its "programmable privacy" and "compliance-friendly" features, opens new possibilities for developers. It's not just about upgrading technical parameters, but more importantly about the potential application scenarios—these are the key factors in evaluating its long-term investment value.
First, let's look at the institutional-grade DeFi direction. Traditional DeFi faces critical issues due to its complete transparency: front-end operational risks, strategy plagiarism, and professional investment funds simply dare not touch it. But on a privacy public chain, things are different. You can build fully private lending pools and trading markets, allowing institutional investors to conduct large transactions without crashing the market. The key is that all operations can be verified through zero-knowledge proofs for regulatory audits. This is the true moment when traditional finance and DeFi shake hands.
Next, consider autonomous identity and data assetization. Personal data is now valuable, but most of it is exploited by centralized platforms for free. If we can turn education, credit, medical records into encrypted verifiable credentials, users can control their disclosure rights? Sharing education credentials with employers, showing credit records to banks, providing health data to medical institutions—all controlled by the user. Privacy is protected, and data value is not wasted.
There are also scenarios like supply chain traceability, intellectual property transactions, and electronic voting. They all require solutions that can prove authenticity while hiding the business secrets of participants. The common point among these applications is clear: they all must rely on the privacy capabilities of the underlying protocol. Without this capability, many scenarios simply cannot be implemented.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
NeverPresent
· 16h ago
Institutional DeFi is something I’m optimistic about, but can zero-knowledge proofs really pass regulatory scrutiny? I always feel like it’s still a gamble on regulatory attitudes.
When you talk about data assetization, I just want to laugh. In the end, it’s still about being cut by new centralized entities.
Whether privacy public chains will be popular mainly depends on whether there are killer applications. Right now, it all feels like armchair strategizing.
This logic sounds good, but what pitfalls might we encounter when implementing it?
Bro, are you promoting a product or genuinely analyzing?
The term "compliance-friendly" is inherently contradictory... Can privacy and regulation truly coexist?
Supply chain traceability definitely has demand, but why must it be on a privacy public chain?
Instead of discussing scenarios, it’s better to talk about who’s actually using it and how user growth is going.
Wait, can zero-knowledge proof audits really meet existing regulatory frameworks?
Institutional entry is a good thing, but don’t overestimate it; they care more about fees and liquidity.
View OriginalReply0
ConfusedWhale
· 19h ago
Wait, can institutional-level DeFi really be implemented? It still feels like a fantasy on paper.
View OriginalReply0
BrokenDAO
· 19h ago
Institution-level DeFi sounds good, but privacy = behind closed doors. Can regulators really trust ZK audits? Or is this another story of "we designed it so cleverly that there won't be any problems"...
View OriginalReply0
NFTregretter
· 19h ago
Institutional DeFi indeed has potential, but how many projects can actually be implemented successfully? It still feels mostly theoretical.
---
Data sovereignty sounds great, but the question is, will users actually take the initiative to manage these credentials? Most people are probably still too lazy.
---
Zero-knowledge proofs for regulatory audits? I can't quite wrap my head around that logic. Can privacy and compliance really coexist?
---
Ultimately, it still depends on whether there are killer applications in the ecosystem. Without them, even the best privacy infrastructure is just a castle in the air.
---
I believe in supply chain traceability, but there need to be enough participants involved. It's a chicken-and-egg problem.
---
It sounds very appealing, but I'm worried it might just be another "technologically advanced but unused" project... There are many such coins.
---
Do institutional investors really lack this? It seems that the liquidity in on-chain lending pools isn't enough for their scale.
View OriginalReply0
WhaleWatcher
· 19h ago
Institutional DeFi is indeed a breakthrough, but the question is: will the big funds truly trust this system? Zero-knowledge proofs sound perfect, but in practice, auditing them is another matter...
View OriginalReply0
BridgeJumper
· 19h ago
Institution-level DeFi is real. Traditional DeFi is so transparent that large funds can't operate easily, but can privacy public chains truly solve the problem of market dumps? Or is this just another round of hype?
View OriginalReply0
HallucinationGrower
· 19h ago
I think the institutional DeFi sector is a bit overly optimistic... Zero-knowledge proof audits sound good, but when it comes to compliance, will regulatory authorities buy it? History tells us the answer is often "no."
The true value of any technology ultimately depends on what applications it can empower. A certain privacy public chain, through its "programmable privacy" and "compliance-friendly" features, opens new possibilities for developers. It's not just about upgrading technical parameters, but more importantly about the potential application scenarios—these are the key factors in evaluating its long-term investment value.
First, let's look at the institutional-grade DeFi direction. Traditional DeFi faces critical issues due to its complete transparency: front-end operational risks, strategy plagiarism, and professional investment funds simply dare not touch it. But on a privacy public chain, things are different. You can build fully private lending pools and trading markets, allowing institutional investors to conduct large transactions without crashing the market. The key is that all operations can be verified through zero-knowledge proofs for regulatory audits. This is the true moment when traditional finance and DeFi shake hands.
Next, consider autonomous identity and data assetization. Personal data is now valuable, but most of it is exploited by centralized platforms for free. If we can turn education, credit, medical records into encrypted verifiable credentials, users can control their disclosure rights? Sharing education credentials with employers, showing credit records to banks, providing health data to medical institutions—all controlled by the user. Privacy is protected, and data value is not wasted.
There are also scenarios like supply chain traceability, intellectual property transactions, and electronic voting. They all require solutions that can prove authenticity while hiding the business secrets of participants. The common point among these applications is clear: they all must rely on the privacy capabilities of the underlying protocol. Without this capability, many scenarios simply cannot be implemented.