What is the biggest fear in borrowing arbitrage? Many people are concerned: "Will the stablecoins borrowed out go to zero?"



This concern actually stems from a stereotypical impression of algorithmic stablecoins. But here’s the key point: lisUSD is not just an algorithmic stablecoin; it is a fully collateralized over-collateralized stablecoin.

In simple terms, each lisUSD in circulation is backed by more than $1 worth of BNB, ETH, or BTCB locked in smart contracts as collateral. This mechanism is exactly the same as MakerDAO’s DAI operation logic and is the most reliable model in the DeFi space after years of testing.

**Market demand is the second line of defense**

Having collateral alone is not enough; supply and demand are the key to maintaining the peg. Currently, high-yield financial activities are creating a huge demand for stablecoins—users need to convert volatile assets into stablecoins to earn yields. This strong borrowing demand keeps lisUSD in active competition in the market. When everyone is rushing to buy lisUSD to participate in yield farming, the price of lisUSD will only be pushed higher, making a de-peg and sharp drop almost impossible.

**Liquidation mechanism is the final insurance**

The Lista protocol has an automatic liquidation protection: once the collateral value falls below the warning line, the system instantly triggers an auction mechanism to automatically liquidate the collateral to repay the debt, which corresponds to burning lisUSD. The entire process is fully automated, requiring no manual intervention, ensuring the security of the system and the true value anchoring of the stablecoin.
BNB0,7%
ETH0,49%
DAI0,01%
LISTA0,12%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
NFTregrettervip
· 19h ago
It's the same over-collateralization scheme again, I'm tired of it... But lisUSD is indeed much more stable and reliable than those air-backed ones.
View OriginalReply0
MEVictimvip
· 19h ago
Over-collateralization + market demand + automatic liquidation, the three-layer insurance is truly reliable, much more stable and dependable than the previous bunch.
View OriginalReply0
MevTearsvip
· 19h ago
Over-collateralization + liquidation mechanism, this combination is indeed much more reliable than just calculating stability alone.
View OriginalReply0
TxFailedvip
· 19h ago
honestly the overcollat model is boring but it works—already learned that lesson with dai back in the day. what gets me tho is the market demand angle, like ppl actually think high yield farming creates *real* demand lmao. it's just yield chasing, same users panic sell the second apy drops. seen this movie before.
Reply0
SmartContractDivervip
· 19h ago
Over-collateralization + market demand + liquidation insurance, the triple defense line is indeed solid, unlike some that claim to be stable but are actually far from it.
View OriginalReply0
ForumLurkervip
· 19h ago
This logic makes sense. Over-collateralization is indeed much more stable and reliable. DAI has been around for so many years without any issues.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-a180694bvip
· 19h ago
Over-collateralization + liquidation mechanism, this combination is indeed much more reliable than just calculating stability. DAI has been operating this way for many years.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)