After taking a close look at the Dusk project, I came to an interesting conclusion — it is not simply repeating the old path of traditional anonymous coins.



$DUSK aims to solve a more complex problem: how to achieve controllable privacy and verifiable financial logic within a regulatory framework at the same time? It sounds a bit contradictory, but in the context of large-scale institutional on-chain adoption, RWA explosion, and security tokenization, it has become a longer-term value direction.

From a technical perspective, Dusk uses zero-knowledge proofs for privacy protection, but the key is that it does not block the audit and compliance interfaces. On-chain transactions can protect user privacy while also providing verifiable information to regulators when necessary — this is the so-called selective disclosure model. In simple terms, it finds an engineering balance between privacy and regulation. This design is naturally more acceptable to banks, brokerages, and enterprise clients.

The consensus mechanism is also carefully designed. Dusk builds a PoS variant tailored for financial scenarios, emphasizing finality, low latency, and predictability — these are essential for securities settlement, payments, and on-chain clearing. Compared to chains supported by DeFi or meme narratives, Dusk is more like building "financial-grade blockchain infrastructure." This means the growth pace may not be very fast in the short term, but once it gains footing, the ceiling will be high.

From an investment perspective, Dusk hits the intersection of "privacy + compliance + RWA + institutional-grade blockchain." This position is neither a dead end for traditional privacy coins nor a pure DeFi gambling scene, but a slowly forming new infrastructure for institutional finance.
DUSK-9,05%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
TokenomicsShamanvip
· 01-12 19:28
Oh, this perspective is interesting. It seems Dusk is indeed playing something different. Privacy and compliance are originally seen as opposites, but under the wave of RWA, they can actually be unified? Okay, I think this idea is solid. Institutions really need this set, otherwise how would banks dare to go on-chain? But in the short term, it will probably be very quiet. When can we see real application implementation for this kind of infrastructure?
View OriginalReply0
BuyHighSellLowvip
· 01-12 16:50
Oh wow, this is truly long-term value, not just projects that survive on hype. Honestly, not many have dared to combine privacy + compliance like this before. Most are either fully closed or regulated to death. Using zero-knowledge proofs for privacy while still leaving an audit trail is indeed an engineering-level wisdom. Banks will definitely buy into this. Wait, can this institutional-grade infrastructure really scale? Or is it just another beautiful story? The slow short-term growth is a bit frustrating, but I believe in the ceiling you mentioned. RWA is the real blue ocean; Dusk has a good niche.
View OriginalReply0
ser_we_are_ngmivip
· 01-12 16:47
Oops, finally someone has figured out Dusk. Isn't it just another clone of an anonymous coin? Privacy + compliance is truly a masterstroke, much more reliable than those purely hide-and-seek coins. Implementing regulatory interfaces with zero-knowledge proofs—that's really what institutions want. The RWA wave is coming, and no one has really filled this position yet. I'm a bit worried about the slow short-term growth. Can it reach that ceiling? This narrative of financial-grade infrastructure sounds like a long-term play, but it also tests faith. Compared to the flashy stuff in DeFi, Dusk does seem a bit boring, but maybe boring is just stable. Can selective disclosure really be accepted by big institutions, or is it just an ideal scenario?
View OriginalReply0
AirdropLickervip
· 01-12 16:46
Wow, this idea is indeed different. The combination of privacy + compliance is worth thinking about carefully. Regulation-friendly anonymous coins? That sounds like walking a tightrope. DUSK is betting on RWA and institutional on-chain, a slow-burn player. Zero-knowledge proofs with selective disclosure, okay, this design is still somewhat interesting. Wait, isn't this tailor-made for banks? Not much short-term appeal, but it definitely fills a blank spot. Compliance and privacy—no one dared to play with this before. If this track really takes off, the ceiling is indeed different. The low latency of PoS is a necessity for settlement, no doubt about that. Reliable is reliable, but it's not as exciting as DeFi. Institutional infrastructure sounds very long-term, to gamble or not? It seems that in the end, this will depend on the progress of RWA.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropBuffetvip
· 01-12 16:43
Haha, alright, finally a project that doesn't pretend to be mysterious and directly talks about cooperation with regulators. I give this approach a thumbs up. Wait, wait, this zero-knowledge proof combined with selective disclosure feels like walking a tightrope. Can it really balance well? Financial-grade infrastructure sounds high-end, but this "slow burn" pace, you really can't get much short-term gains... Betting on the long term? I'm optimistic about the institutional chain track, but whether Dusk can really break out from the crypto circle depends on how RWA develops later. These compliant privacy solutions, in the end, are vulnerable to regulatory policy changes in various countries. Seems like there are quite a few risk points.
View OriginalReply0
AlwaysQuestioningvip
· 01-12 16:42
Oh wait, the idea of Dusk is interesting. It seems to genuinely avoid the old tricks of privacy coins. Regulation-friendly privacy solutions? How is that even possible... No, selective disclosure sounds more reliable. Financial-grade infrastructure? That sounds a bit optimistic, doesn't it? Will institutions really buy into this? No growth potential in the short term, so what are the current buyers aiming for... The risk isn't small. The real key is RWA, privacy is just a bonus.
View OriginalReply0
RatioHuntervip
· 01-12 16:38
Hmm, the combination of privacy + compliance is indeed interesting. However, the real test is the adoption rate. By the way, Dusk's positioning feels like a gamble on whether institutional-level narratives will really gain traction. Zero-knowledge proofs have been around for a while; the key is still the ecosystem and acceptance. Will banks really use it? Short-term dullness, long-term high ceiling—I've heard this argument many times before. But it's definitely better than just privacy coins. Selective disclosure sounds like an attempt to please both sides—regulators and users. The difficulty is indeed significant.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)