There is a lot of noise in the current crypto market, but some projects are quietly doing meaningful work. ListaDAO is one such example — it didn't chase the hype, but instead focused on a real pain point: how to make staked assets generate yields while maintaining enough flexibility?



This issue may seem simple, but solving it is quite nuanced. ListaDAO's approach is to combine liquid staking with lending. The mainstream assets you hold can, through this mechanism, not only generate returns but also be used as collateral to obtain low-cost liquidity. In other words, you don't have to choose between "holding long-term" and "using money now"; both can be achieved simultaneously.

The project itself also has many highlights. It is backed by top-tier industry capital, deeply rooted in the mainstream public chain ecosystem, with a transparent and traceable development roadmap. Notably, recent community decisions stand out: they conducted governance votes to burn some tokens to optimize the economic model and significantly accelerated decision-making cycles. These actions are not for short-term speculation but for the ongoing health of the protocol and the long-term interests of the community, truly reflecting the pragmatic attitude of the builders.

Security is also a top priority. Over-collateralization, transparent mechanisms, and other fundamental safeguards are solidly in place, with user assets and protocol stability at the core. The ecosystem adopts an open mindset, collaborating with other quality protocols to build a more comprehensive DeFi financial service network, providing users with more options.

This logic is simple but effective: address real needs, have an execution-oriented team, ensure security and transparency, and foster high community participation. Among many projects riding the hype wave, such focus is particularly rare.
DEFI-0,13%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
DiamondHandsvip
· 1h ago
Comments on cutting losses without abandoning love: 1. The step of destroying tokens to optimize the model truly shows sincerity, unlike some projects that just shout slogans 2. The combination of liquid staking and lending, in simple terms, is to make assets earn more money, but the implementation difficulty should not be small 3. Rooted deeply in mainstream public chains with capital backing, these conditions at least indicate it’s not an air project 4. High transparency and quick decision-making, such community governance is indeed rare; most projects operate behind closed doors 5. Solid over-collateralization for security, ListaDAO has not been vague about this 6. Collaborating with other protocols to build an ecosystem, this broader vision is much better than working in isolation 7. The current market really needs projects that don’t ride the coattails of trends but focus on solving real problems 8. Their recent actions show that the builders are truly pragmatic and not restless 9. Such projects are easily overlooked because they don’t hype, but their long-term value is actually more stable 10. Staking yields combined with liquidity, this demand is indeed a pain point, and it’s being addressed quite well
View OriginalReply0
YieldWhisperervip
· 17h ago
Really? Staking yields and liquidity provision at the same time—this idea should have been implemented long ago. Finally seeing projects that don’t open blind boxes, but directly address real needs. Token burn optimization model? That move deserves praise, much more reliable than just shouting about consensus every day. I'm just wondering, with such a solid plan, why hasn't it skyrocketed? Token burning clearly shows they’re not here to scalp users, quite interesting. I believe in solid security mechanisms, but unfortunately, the market might not buy it. Collaborating with other protocols to build an ecosystem—that’s what Web3 should be doing. Over-collateralization done so transparently, why still be cautious? Oh right, fear of attacks. Focusing on pain points instead of chasing trends—this team’s personality I appreciate. Wait, is community participation really high? Or is it just talk? The pragmatic attitude of builders sounds good, but execution is the key. An open-minded ecosystem is great, but I worry about parasitism. I agree with this logic; focus truly is a rare commodity.
View OriginalReply0
BearWhisperGodvip
· 17h ago
This is truly a rare clear-headed project, not following the trend of hype and speculation, but instead prioritizing real needs. Hmm... The combination of liquid staking + lending indeed solves my long-standing dilemma, eliminating the need to choose between yield and liquidity. Top-tier capital endorsement + transparent roadmap + community governance—these elements together make the trust level much higher than those projects that boast every day. The token burn optimization model is not for short-term speculation; I respect that, as it is genuinely a long-term effort. The security mechanism cannot be sloppy. Over-collateralization + transparent design prioritize user interests, and I understand this attitude. The idea of open ecosystem cooperation is also good. Not exclusive, but aiming to grow the entire DeFi ecosystem. Among all these projects, maintaining this level of focus is indeed quite rare.
View OriginalReply0
SelfMadeRuggeevip
· 17h ago
Token burn optimizes the economic model. I’ve looked into this operation, and it’s indeed quite interesting, not the kind of pump-and-dump scheme. Finally, there’s a project that doesn’t rely on hype to survive. Let’s see how far it can go. Liquidity staking plus lending? Honestly, this combination has been played by others before. ListaDAO’s chance to stand out depends on execution. Top-tier capital backing sounds comfortable, but I pay more attention to their community voting decisiveness. The recent token burn decision was indeed ruthless. Many DeFi projects are just bluffing now, and a steady, solid approach like ListaDAO’s is becoming rare. Balancing staking and using funds? If they can really do this well, many will buy in, but they need to guard against risks sneaking in. A solid over-collateralization mechanism is good, preventing another protocol black swan event. Collaborating with other protocols to build the network sounds harmonious, but too many projects in the ecosystem end up fighting alone. Hope they can stick to it. Being pragmatic in the crypto world can seem pretentious, but if ListaDAO can keep this attitude, they’ve already won.
View OriginalReply0
NFT_Therapy_Groupvip
· 17h ago
Really? Finally seeing a project that not only talks the talk but also implements real solutions to practical problems. Let me ponder this win-win logic—staking generates yields and can also be used for borrowing. It sounds good, and the key is that they are truly willing to burn tokens to optimize the model. Such backbone is rare. But it still depends on how the subsequent execution goes. Top-tier capital backing is not a guarantee. Let's see how far the ecosystem development can go.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • بالعربية
  • Português (Brasil)
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Español
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Русский
  • 繁體中文
  • Українська
  • Tiếng Việt