2026-01-12 16:21:19

There has been quite a bit of discussion about the popularity of Solstice Flares, but I am more interested in the mathematical model behind this Xeet event.

Breaking it down, the incentive design for creators is quite interesting—1% of the supply is allocated to the Top 100 creators, which translates to 10M SLX out of the total 1B supply. This proportion is considered quite generous in the context of current project plans.

What’s even more noteworthy is the valuation background. During the community funding phase, Solstice's FDV valuation reached $130M. Considering the scale of creator incentives and ecosystem layout, this number is quite meaningful. To understand the true value potential of the project, these detailed data points are much more reliable than just discussing popularity.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

7 Likes

Reward
7
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ForumMiningMaster

· 17h ago

1% allocated to the top 100 creators? That's a significant move, but whether the $130M FDV can support this level of incentive is the key question. By the way, the more detailed the mathematical model is broken down, the more it reveals the project's true ambitions. It's not meaningful to just hype up the buzz; what's important is whether the data can be self-consistent. Projects with well-designed creator incentive mechanisms truly have different ecosystem stickiness. 10M SLX sounds like a lot, but you need to calculate what level of dilution that entails. These days, when evaluating projects, it's better to discard hype and follow the data for a more reliable assessment.

View OriginalReply0

RugpullAlertOfficer

· 17h ago

Damn, another project with a $130M valuation, and Top 100 creators only get $10M. By the way, that ratio is indeed quite generous.

View OriginalReply0

0xLuckbox

· 17h ago

No hype, no negativity. Giving 10M to creators is indeed a big move, much more considerate than projects that only allocate 0.5%. The true value lies in the details. The $130M valuation is a reference point that needs to be carefully considered. Supply distribution is often overlooked, but it actually reveals whether the team has a brain. Data speaks for itself. Popularity is superficial; the incentive mechanism is the real deal. Taking out 1% of the 1B supply—this ratio is quite rare nowadays... savvy investors can see through it. That group only chasing popularity simply cannot see the underlying logical design. A $130M FDV benchmarked against similar projects—this valuation is actually quite interesting, not an unreasonable ask. Once the creator incentive design is in place, the ecosystem can truly take off. Just hype alone is useless. Releasing specific numbers makes it more convincing. I like this transparent approach.

View OriginalReply0

DegenTherapist