2026-01-12 16:20:14

IOPn (Internet of People) Project Latest Progress: This sovereign Layer 1 blockchain platform, OPN Chain, continues to advance its布局 in digital identity, AI, and RWA fields. The core philosophy of the project is straightforward—"One chain, one identity, complete autonomy."

Why is this approach worth关注？In the increasingly fierce competition for Web3 infrastructure, IOPn chooses to start from the fundamental需求 of user digital identity, attempting to build a truly user-controlled基础设施 system. Digital identity, AI models, on-chain real-world assets... these directions all point to the same trend: future Web3 applications will require more完善的身份验证 and asset mapping capabilities.

The design philosophy of OPN Chain is to enable identity, data, and assets to operate in a sovereign manner, rather than being bound to a centralized platform. For developers and users, this means more自由度 and possibilities. Of course, whether this fully自主模式 can be implemented and whether the ecosystem can truly thrive still requires time to验证.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

13 Likes

Reward
13
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

DegenWhisperer

· 11h ago

Self-sovereign identity sounds good, but I'm worried it's just another PPT chain. --- Can the sovereignty model really take off? It seems every new chain claims the same. --- It's about identity and RWA again. What about the ecosystem? Where's the tokenomics? --- Wow, finally someone seriously working on the identity layer. This direction has been overlooked for too long. --- Fully autonomous? Let's see if they can attract developers first before bragging. --- I'm a bit interested in digital identity, but it depends on how they handle the conflict between privacy and regulation.

View OriginalReply0

MultiSigFailMaster

· 11h ago

Decentralized identity is definitely worth pondering, but it feels like déjà vu. Sounds good, but how does it work in practice? Every L1 claims to be decentralized. Autonomy sounds great, but what really matters is the ecosystem; otherwise, it's just a PowerPoint dream. I've seen this logic several times; only those who survive are the winners. Sovereign identity sounds like a killer feature, but do users really care? Or is it just for fun? What new tricks can OPN come up with this time? It feels a bit old-fashioned. On-chain identity—how is privacy protected? That's the real issue.

View OriginalReply0

Layer3Dreamer

· 11h ago

theoretically speaking, if we map identity verification onto a recursive SNARK framework... the interoperability vector here is actually wild. sovereign identity + RWA on-chain? that's giving major cross-rollup state verification energy ngl

Reply0

bridgeOops

· 12h ago

Identity verification is indeed a pain point, but can it really be achieved? Let's try and see.

View OriginalReply0

ETHmaxi_NoFilter

· 12h ago

The idea of self-sovereignty sounds good, but I'm worried it's just another marketing tactic for an air project. A truly usable ecosystem is the key; having just a concept isn't enough. How is the development progress on OPN? Are there any real applications? The concept of sovereign chains has been hyped for years, but ultimately it depends on who can truly attract users. It still feels like in the conceptual stage; let's wait until there are actual products.

View OriginalReply0

rug_connoisseur

· 12h ago

Identity is indeed a pain point, but the term "completely autonomous" is just for listening; very few projects can truly achieve it. It's promising, but we still have to wait for ecosystem data to speak. The sovereignty narrative is back again; haven't we heard enough of it before?

View OriginalReply0