Ethereum founder Vitalik recently articulated a core philosophy: Ethereum's future should not depend on continuous developer maintenance to operate, but rather evolve gradually into a truly trustless or minimally trust-based application infrastructure.
The logic behind this is clear— as the ecosystem matures sufficiently, the protocol itself must have the capability to solidify. In other words, Ethereum should transition from a system that requires constant iteration and upgrades to a stable architecture capable of self-improvement but ultimately able to "freeze."
Specifically, Vitalik outlined several key objectives: first, complete quantum resistance. This is not hype but a real long-term risk—the development of quantum computing could threaten existing cryptographic foundations. Second, support for scalable architectures like ZK-EVM and PeerDAS. Zero-knowledge proofs and peer-to-peer data availability sampling have already proven to be important directions for scalability.
In addition, Ethereum needs to establish a sustainable state model spanning decades and implement full account abstraction. These may sound like technical details, but each is crucial for Ethereum to become a truly infrastructure-level application.
This approach reflects Ethereum's increasing maturity—from pursuing rapid innovation to focusing on long-term stability.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
18 Likes
Reward
18
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
DEXRobinHood
· 4h ago
Wow, this is the real infrastructure mindset, not just doing fancy tricks every day.
View OriginalReply0
alpha_leaker
· 12h ago
V God is starting to hype again, talking about quantum resistance, account abstraction, state models... They all sound impressive, but real implementation will have to wait until the Year of the Monkey or the Year of the Horse.
View OriginalReply0
consensus_whisperer
· 14h ago
Freeze protocol? It sounds like they want it to run permanently, but it seems a bit difficult... Quantum computing is the real disaster.
View OriginalReply0
AlwaysQuestioning
· 14h ago
Wait, is the term "freezing architecture" really serious? It seems a bit too idealistic.
View OriginalReply0
NoStopLossNut
· 14h ago
Quantum-resistant security sounds a bit exaggerated, but it's truly necessary to be prepared in advance.
This time, I quite favor V's approach. From crazy iterations to pursuing stability, it feels like what a major protocol should be doing.
Decades-long state models? Honestly, the key is how to implement this step effectively.
View OriginalReply0
OldLeekNewSickle
· 14h ago
Sounds good, but it's just fear of being accused of protocol dependence on someone and shifting the blame to technical difficulty.
View OriginalReply0
OptionWhisperer
· 14h ago
Vitalik is starting to hype again. The freezing protocol sounds good, but can it really be achieved?
Ethereum founder Vitalik recently articulated a core philosophy: Ethereum's future should not depend on continuous developer maintenance to operate, but rather evolve gradually into a truly trustless or minimally trust-based application infrastructure.
The logic behind this is clear— as the ecosystem matures sufficiently, the protocol itself must have the capability to solidify. In other words, Ethereum should transition from a system that requires constant iteration and upgrades to a stable architecture capable of self-improvement but ultimately able to "freeze."
Specifically, Vitalik outlined several key objectives: first, complete quantum resistance. This is not hype but a real long-term risk—the development of quantum computing could threaten existing cryptographic foundations. Second, support for scalable architectures like ZK-EVM and PeerDAS. Zero-knowledge proofs and peer-to-peer data availability sampling have already proven to be important directions for scalability.
In addition, Ethereum needs to establish a sustainable state model spanning decades and implement full account abstraction. These may sound like technical details, but each is crucial for Ethereum to become a truly infrastructure-level application.
This approach reflects Ethereum's increasing maturity—from pursuing rapid innovation to focusing on long-term stability.