The platform's rules are like the rules of the martial world; everyone must abide by them to survive. What if everyone arbitrarily breaks them? Then, how can there be any trust in this place? It's basically over.
But on the other hand, these kinds of issues are indeed easy to fall into traps. If someone can truly provide complete proof that they operated themselves, I think there is still room for the exchange to be more humanized. After all, rules are necessary, but practical situations should also be considered, and not be too rigid. Some problems may not be intentional violations; good communication can also resolve them.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
8 Likes
Reward
8
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ForkTrooper
· 01-12 09:23
Rules are rules, but the rigid approach of the exchange can really make people frustrated. Sometimes, a bit of communication can truly resolve the issue.
View OriginalReply0
PrivateKeyParanoia
· 01-12 09:20
That's true, but which exchange would really listen to your explanation now? Basically, they just freeze your account and be done with it.
View OriginalReply0
TokenToaster
· 01-12 09:18
Haha, you're right. No rules really lead to chaos.
---
Oh, I pay attention to this topic. Sometimes, exchanges really need to learn to be flexible.
---
I agree, but the prerequisite is to have all the evidence prepared; don't be half-hearted.
---
The rigidity of rules is indeed a common problem. I hope exchanges can listen.
---
The key is humanized communication. Sometimes, a phone call can solve the problem.
---
By the way, the boundary between intentional violations and unintentional pitfalls is sometimes hard to define.
---
In these matters, transparency is the most important. Be proactive about trading gains.
View OriginalReply0
VitalikFanboy42
· 01-12 09:05
Rules are fixed, but people are flexible. That's the eternal dilemma in the crypto world.
The platform's rules are like the rules of the martial world; everyone must abide by them to survive. What if everyone arbitrarily breaks them? Then, how can there be any trust in this place? It's basically over.
But on the other hand, these kinds of issues are indeed easy to fall into traps. If someone can truly provide complete proof that they operated themselves, I think there is still room for the exchange to be more humanized. After all, rules are necessary, but practical situations should also be considered, and not be too rigid. Some problems may not be intentional violations; good communication can also resolve them.