2026-01-12 08:28:35

Next Thursday could become a significant turning point in the recent history of the cryptocurrency industry.

The CLARITY Act, which was passed in the U.S. House of Representatives with an overwhelming majority last September, will enter the formal voting stage on January 15. Many people ask whether this is a positive or negative development for the industry, but that's the wrong question. The real significance lies in— for the first time— clarifying those long-standing ambiguities.

What will be the future identity of exchanges, brokerages, and market makers in the U.S.? Which regulatory body should oversee them? There will be a relatively clear answer. No longer will there be wild growth by jumping from one regulatory jurisdiction to another.

What is the more core change? The bill substantively shifts some authority that was originally monopolized by the SEC to the CFTC. And the CFTC’s regulatory standards are much more lenient. This adjustment in the power structure will have a far deeper impact on the entire market ecosystem than short-term price fluctuations.

What are American crypto entrepreneurs most afraid of in recent years? It’s not that they can’t develop products, but that they might suddenly receive a legal notice at any time. This kind of uncertainty can make any team nervous. The core value of the CLARITY Act is actually quite simple: it doesn’t necessarily relax all regulations, but at least provides a checklist. It tells you which paths are viable and which pitfalls to avoid.

What does this mean for project teams? They can restart various experiments within a compliant framework, rather than developing while constantly worrying about investigations. For the entire market, it’s more like a "clearance + opening of the floodgates"— clearing away risks in ambiguous areas and then opening the door for the next wave of participants.

You ask how prices will move in the short term? Honestly, that’s not that important.

What’s truly worth watching is: the industry’s rules are beginning to take shape.

Once the regulatory framework is established, capital, talent, and projects are likely to flow back into the U.S. playing field.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

18 Likes

Reward
18
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

DegenTherapist

· 14h ago

Finally, someone has clarified this matter. It's not a matter of good news or bad news; there must be rules in place. --- The SEC has monopolized for so long, and now they are finally willing to loosen up. Will the CFTC take over, or will it be the same old story with a different name? --- Really, the shadow of legal notices is more frightening than anything else. At least now we know where the boundaries are. --- The analogy of clearing the field and opening the floodgates is excellent. In simple terms, it's the process of wild growth evolving into a regulated industry. --- This card game in the US is definitely worth a gamble. Having clear rules is much better than blindly feeling your way around. --- Can the tone be set on January 15? Or will it be another cycle of ups and downs? --- Saying that short-term price movements are not important is indeed eye-opening, but when you're bottom-fishing, you still have to look at the K-line. --- What are you afraid of? Anyway, big institutions have long hired lawyers, and it's the small teams that suffer. --- Is the claim that the CFTC is more relaxed than the SEC reliable? Is there concrete data to support this? --- It will probably take a long time for the regulatory framework to be fully implemented, but as long as the direction is correct, that's enough.

View OriginalReply0

AlphaLeaker

· 14h ago

Wow, someone finally explained this clearly. It was really a tangled mess before. Wait, is the SEC handing over authority to the CFTC? Now entrepreneurs can finally sleep peacefully. The compliance framework is simple to explain but also complex, depending on how the Americans decide to tinker with it. Don't worry about the price; the key is that the rules are taking shape. That's the real positive news, right?

View OriginalReply0

NotFinancialAdvice

· 15h ago

Honestly, instead of guessing short-term prices, it's better to focus on whether this bill can really pass... The US side is always fluctuating. Don't just listen to the good or bad news; the checklist is the most important, at least to know which pitfalls to avoid. CFTC taking over is indeed much more moderate than the SEC, that's where the uncertainty lies. Entrepreneurs fear legal notices more than a bear market; only when this bill passes will it count. Once the rules are set, institutional funds won't run away, just wait and see. I just want to know if next year can really attract back those projects that went to Singapore. Anyway, we'll find out next Thursday; what’s meant to come will come.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropHunter007

· 15h ago

Finally someone has explained this clearly—the power struggle between the SEC and CFTC is the real highlight. Wait, after this bill passes, will the US become the most friendly crypto jurisdiction? The terror of legal letters is real; many good projects have been scared away just like that. The vote on January 15 could determine the future of the US crypto scene, so we must keep a close watch. Instead of guessing price fluctuations, it's better to see how the rules are set; once the rules are in place, the money will naturally follow. I've long wanted to sue the SEC for monopoly power; the CFTC's standards are indeed more lenient. So, is this good news or bad news for projects in Europe and other regions? As retail investors, what short-term benefits can we get, or do we have to wait for big capital to enter before it's our turn?

View OriginalReply0

RugpullSurvivor

· 15h ago

Finally, someone has spoken the truth. This is the real big event, not just price fluctuations. Taking some power out of the SEC's claws and giving it to the CFTC—that's the real deal. Legal notices are no longer a sword hanging over everyone's head. American entrepreneurs can finally breathe a sigh of relief. A clear rule list is much more reliable than wild surges and crashes.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeCrier

· 15h ago

Damn, there are finally rules, the fear of being controlled by legal notices these past few years has been very real. --- CFTC is way more comfortable than SEC; switching regulators changes the experience entirely. --- Basically, it's about stopping the bleeding; it's more reliable than continuing to mess around in the gray area. --- I'm not concerned about short-term rises and falls; I just want a clear way forward. This demand isn't unreasonable, right? --- I like the idea of clearing the field and opening the floodgates; I feel like next Thursday might really change something. --- The biggest fear is uncertainty. Now there's finally a bottom line, and building projects can be more solid. --- Moving power from SEC to CFTC? That's a big deal, more substantial than any positive news. --- Compliance trial-and-error vs. being investigated, anyone would choose the former. Finally, we can build with confidence.

View OriginalReply0