zkML currently faces significant performance bottlenecks. Generating a complete zero-knowledge proof each time makes it difficult for this solution to reach practical application. Production environments have strict requirements for three key metrics—latency, cost, and code maintainability. Full proof generation is basically unsustainable for all parties involved.
To break through the impasse, several directions need to be seriously considered. Modular architecture seems to be a promising approach. By decomposing the proof process and optimizing the critical path, it is possible to greatly reduce computational overhead while ensuring security. This could be the key to making zkML truly usable.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
6 Likes
Reward
6
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
AirdropHunterXiao
· 19h ago
To be honest, I've long given up on the path of full proof, as the costs have skyrocketed.
View OriginalReply0
MondayYoloFridayCry
· 20h ago
The full proof route is indeed stuck; the cost explosion is unbearable for everyone.
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainTalker
· 20h ago
actually... the modular approach is compelling, but we're glossing over the real ecosystem dynamics here. full proofs failing on all three fronts (latency, cost, maintainability) was basically inevitable given current constraints. think of it like trying to run a mainnet validator on a raspberry pi—theoretically sound, practically a nightmare.
Reply0
AirdropLicker
· 20h ago
Bro is right, full proof is a trap. Modularization is a move I support.
zkML currently faces significant performance bottlenecks. Generating a complete zero-knowledge proof each time makes it difficult for this solution to reach practical application. Production environments have strict requirements for three key metrics—latency, cost, and code maintainability. Full proof generation is basically unsustainable for all parties involved.
To break through the impasse, several directions need to be seriously considered. Modular architecture seems to be a promising approach. By decomposing the proof process and optimizing the critical path, it is possible to greatly reduce computational overhead while ensuring security. This could be the key to making zkML truly usable.