The $2.5 billion renovation and expansion project of the Federal Reserve headquarters building— is this budget really reasonable?
From a market perspective, $1 billion is enough for any contractor to complete a similar-scale infrastructure project. This suggests there may be significant markup in the budget. While it is difficult to determine whether corruption has occurred, cost management issues are worth examining.
More importantly, should such infrastructure projects really require the Federal Reserve Chair to be directly involved in decision-making? From an organizational perspective, infrastructure maintenance is usually handled by specialized departments and contractors, with senior management typically making strategic decisions only at key points. If project costs are high, it is more likely to reflect efficiency issues at the middle management level rather than mistakes at the decision-making level.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
· 10h ago
2.5 billion renovation of a building? That must be so luxurious, it feels like three could be built with that.
View OriginalReply0
just_vibin_onchain
· 21h ago
2.5 billion invested in renovations? Where is the transparent governance we were promised? I can't understand where this money went.
View OriginalReply0
MEVictim
· 01-12 08:53
2.5 billion? How greedy can you be? 1 billion is enough, where did the remaining 1.5 billion go?
View OriginalReply0
MemeEchoer
· 01-12 08:53
2.5 billion to build a wall? Why not just use gold directly, haha
View OriginalReply0
HappyMinerUncle
· 01-12 08:52
2.5 billion to mine black gold? Middle management just taking kickbacks, this trick is old news.
View OriginalReply0
GasOptimizer
· 01-12 08:52
2.5 billion vs 1 billion, calculating this arbitrage space... hmm, someone must be making the big profit in the middle, right?
View OriginalReply0
LiquidationWatcher
· 01-12 08:43
2.5 billion renovation? smh, how many mafia members would it take to swallow that up?
View OriginalReply0
SignatureLiquidator
· 01-12 08:29
2.5 billion for renovation? Wake up, 1 billion is enough, okay? Who's covering the difference in the middle...
Really treating taxpayers' money as your own, outrageous.
Speaking of which, does the Federal Reserve Chair need to worry about this kind of thing? Shouldn't the people below handle it? Why does the top leader have to step in...
This is too outrageous, feels like this problem is everywhere.
How are middle management supposed to handle it? When costs spill over, someone has to take the blame.
The $2.5 billion renovation and expansion project of the Federal Reserve headquarters building— is this budget really reasonable?
From a market perspective, $1 billion is enough for any contractor to complete a similar-scale infrastructure project. This suggests there may be significant markup in the budget. While it is difficult to determine whether corruption has occurred, cost management issues are worth examining.
More importantly, should such infrastructure projects really require the Federal Reserve Chair to be directly involved in decision-making? From an organizational perspective, infrastructure maintenance is usually handled by specialized departments and contractors, with senior management typically making strategic decisions only at key points. If project costs are high, it is more likely to reflect efficiency issues at the middle management level rather than mistakes at the decision-making level.