2026-01-12 02:21:10

Monero's value proposition is actually worth examining more closely. Compare the fundamentals: scarcity levels far exceed that of gold, while requiring zero physical infrastructure to store or transport. Moving value across borders takes minutes instead of months. The annual supply inflation rate sits substantially below precious metals—a structural advantage often overlooked. Then there's the asymmetry nobody talks about: you cannot manufacture new Monero from asteroid mining or deep ocean exploration. The supply ceiling is fixed by code, not geological luck. This makes the "digital gold" narrative around Bitcoin look rather tame by comparison. Monero's technical positioning as a scarce, portable, and truly finite asset creates a fundamentally different investment case—one that deserves closer scrutiny from anyone serious about sound money mechanics.

BTC0,77%

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

11 Likes

Reward
11
10
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

SwapWhisperer

· 1h ago

Really? I hadn't thought about not being able to mine new XMR. That's interesting.

View OriginalReply0

WalletsWatcher

· 1h ago

NGL, Monero's logic is indeed quite aggressive, and Bitcoin's "digital gold" narrative has been thoroughly challenged. The point about the supply cap is a bit absolute; the code is hardcoded, so there's no way to mine asteroids for new coins... that's true scarcity. Being able to handle cross-border transfers in minutes is indeed impressive; traditional finance is laughing to death. Wait, is this secretly promoting Monero? Haha. The inflation rate of supply is even lower than precious metals? Where does this data come from? Need to check. Zero-cost value storage is a bit outrageous; if that's really the case, why is the market still sleeping?

View OriginalReply0

Rugpull幸存者

· 3h ago

Stop bragging, only if XMR can really outperform BTC is that impressive --- The hard-coded cap is indeed absolute, but market acceptance is way too low --- I've heard this narrative about privacy coins a hundred times, but they still can't escape delisting from exchanges --- Scarcity is well explained here, but what about liquidity? That’s the real issue --- Haha, you want to whitewash small coins again, I’m betting on you --- Bitcoin tame? Laughable, that’s because BTC has long been priced in, XMR is still dreaming --- No one mentioned the advantage of a fixed supply before, that’s actually interesting --- Fast cross-border transfers are real, but privacy features make it a regulatory nightmare --- Always trying to package XMR as a new store of value, but the market never buys the story --- From a purely technical perspective, it’s correct, but the market never cares about technology --- Having a supply cap written in code > luck in geological exploration, I agree with that --- Here comes the same old story of "undervalued assets," every time the same routine --- If you really believe in it, go all in, what’s the point of just analyzing --- No feeling, the outlook for privacy coins is just like this

View OriginalReply0

ChainSherlockGirl

· 01-12 15:52

Wait, I need to ponder this... Are you saying XMR is more scarce than BTC? How does on-chain data show that? I’ll check the wallet addresses and get back to you. --- In my analysis, the fixed supply in cryptography is indeed impressive, but why does the market still overlook Monero? Interestingly, --- Haha, the idea that "code determines the cap"... sounds romantic, but what about reality? Just a risk warning, everyone. --- Hourly cross-border transfers vs. gold over several months—this really hits the point, but does anyone care about efficiency? --- I just looked through a bunch of large wallet addresses. Monero’s activity data... hmm, the story might not be that simple. --- Is it too early to conclude that Bitcoin is "mediocre"? Mostly personal speculation. --- "Geological luck" vs. "code certainty"—I buy this comparison, but what about market acceptance? To be continued.

View OriginalReply0

LoneValidator

· 01-12 02:51

But does XMR really have the same level of consensus as BTC... That's the real issue.

View OriginalReply0

UnluckyLemur

· 01-12 02:51

The scarcity logic of XMR indeed outperforms BTC. The hard-coded cap in the code is much more reliable than geological luck.

View OriginalReply0

BearMarketBarber

· 01-12 02:51

Speaking of Monero, this thing is seriously underrated. Its hard-coded supply in the code is even more solid than gold... The so-called "digital gold" narrative of Bitcoin now seems a bit overrated.

View OriginalReply0

AltcoinTherapist

· 01-12 02:50

Has anyone seriously discussed the logic behind XMR? Having the supply cap written into the code is truly impressive. The "digital gold" narrative of BTC now sounds a bit exaggerated; XMR's scarcity design is truly solid and unbreakable. But it still depends on adoption. No matter how perfect the mechanism is, it needs people to use it.

View OriginalReply0

ser_ngmi

· 01-12 02:49

NGL, Monero from this perspective really hasn't been hyped much, and the fixed supply in the code is truly impressive. The supply is permanently capped, which is much more honest than Bitcoin, honestly. Cross-border transfers in just a few minutes? Now that's true financial freedom, brother. To be honest, Monero's scarcity logic is even more absolute than gold, with no geological luck variables. The phrase "code is law" is best exemplified by Monero.

View OriginalReply0

ContractSurrender

· 01-12 02:40

Hmm... this logic is indeed interesting, but the Bitcoin folks need to listen up.

View OriginalReply0