2026-01-12 01:30:42

Is BLIND heading toward its next all-time high, or are warning signs already flashing?

On paper, the project ticks the right boxes: solid technical foundation, credible team members, and a functional product actually delivering value. That's the bullish case.

But then the contradictions start piling up. The X account got suspended—twice. Meanwhile, the Telegram channel remains operating smoothly, and they just launched a fresh Facebook presence. So what's really going on here?

Three possibilities on the table:

First, coordinated censorship hitting the project unfairly. Second, organized FUD campaigns targeting the community. Third—and this one stings differently—the suspension might be legitimate early warning signs finally surfacing.

Liquidity conditions are another puzzle piece worth examining closely. When fundamentals look this mixed, market depth becomes crucial. Watch the order books. That's where reality lives.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

14 Likes

Reward
14
9
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

HalfIsEmpty

· 13h ago

Being banned twice is a bit suspicious, yet Telegram is still lively... Is it truly censorship or just self-sabotage? I trust the fundamentals, but these crazy moves are really hard to hold up. Liquidity is the key, the order book doesn't lie. Another project that is "perfect fundamentals but full of strange signs," I've seen plenty. Telegram is hot, x gets banned, Facebook comes to rescue... Why does this routine feel so familiar? For half-position play, liquidity depth is crucial. Ultimately, authenticity still depends on the accumulation of orders; everything else is just talk. Among these three explanations, the third one hits the hardest—early warning signals were laid out, after all.

View OriginalReply0

wrekt_but_learning

· 01-12 22:55

X being banned twice can't be just a coincidence... These details are a bit unsettling. --- No matter how good the fundamentals sound, you have to watch out for liquidity crashes. Don't be fooled by the story. --- Double ban + new Facebook account? I've seen this trick too many times. --- The surface may look glamorous and deceive people easily, but the order book is the true mirror. --- Compliance issues are still targeted... It's hard to say, but being taken down twice is definitely a warning sign. --- When fundamentals are in chaos, it's the easiest time to get cut. Who's really throwing real money to dump? --- Censorship sounds nice, but what if the project actually has problems? --- Just because Telegram still seems active, you think everything's fine? But who dares to think that?

View OriginalReply0

BoredStaker

· 01-12 14:39

Has x been banned twice? This thing is a bit impressive, but it's also quite outrageous. --- The fundamentals look good, but the frequency of bans really doesn't add up. --- Liquidity is the key; don't just look at the surface data. --- Telegram is still alive, which means it's not completely dead; keep observing. --- The order book doesn't lie; that's the real truth. --- Being banned twice isn't a coincidence; we need to dig into the root cause. --- Looks good on paper but keeps getting banned; the discrepancy is quite significant.

View OriginalReply0

RooftopVIP

· 01-12 01:58

The fact that X was banned twice... to be honest, it's a bit suspicious. Even the most outstanding projects wouldn't be subjected to this, right? --- While the fundamentals are good, having your X account banned twice definitely raises questions. This is no small matter. --- Liquidity is the real litmus test; no matter how good the project is, if no one buys, it's useless. --- Something's off. Why is it that only X was precisely targeted twice, while Telegram and FB are still lively and active... --- Wait, is it really censorship or is there an issue with ourselves? It's too vague to pursue. --- Just look at the order book to understand what's going on. Don't listen to those excuses; data is the most honest.

View OriginalReply0

AlwaysMissingTops

· 01-12 01:58

The fact that X was banned twice is indeed a bit strange, but the fact that Telegram is still active—what does that mean... It's hard to tell if it's real or fake. --- Order book is the real deal; when the fundamentals are a mess, looking at liquidity is more reliable. --- Why does it feel like this project is always being falsely accused? Or is there really a problem? --- Facebook new account? Is this a shift or an attempt to avoid the spotlight... --- Surface data looks good, but what's the use? The key issue is that X was banned twice—this is no small matter. --- Liquidity depth is where you can really see the clues; don't be fooled by the hype.

View OriginalReply0

DegenMcsleepless

· 01-12 01:36

The fact that X was banned twice is a bit outrageous, but as long as TG is still alive, it doesn't really seem like a genuine risk signal. Liquidity is the key, right? This thing looks too contradictory. With such a chaotic fundamental situation, the order book will tell the truth.

View OriginalReply0

UncleWhale

· 01-12 01:36

Has account x been banned twice? That's not quite right... No matter how good the fundamentals are, it can't withstand such turbulence. Liquidity is the real story; just look at the order book to see the truth or falsehood. There is no such thing as a free lunch in the world; this round is a bit risky.

View OriginalReply0

MetaMasked

· 01-12 01:31

Being banned twice is indeed a bit extreme, but Telegram is still lively and active. This logic doesn't add up. Being banned twice in a row really can't be sustained, yet Telegram still operates happily... It's a bit strange. Liquidity is the key; when the fundamentals are unclear, you must keep a close eye on the order book and not be fooled by narratives. No matter how good the technicals are, they can't save social accounts that have been banned twice. This is no small matter. Is it really FUD or is there actually a problem? Just look at Telegram's popularity to know. The issue of being banned on X twice needs to be clarified; don't end up discovering you've dug your own grave.

View OriginalReply0