The real challenge of decentralized storage is right in front of us: how to ensure high fault tolerance without letting costs spiral out of control?



The Walrus protocol provides an answer with its self-developed RedStuff 2D encoding technology. Compared to traditional solutions, its approach is entirely different. Filecoin uses Reed-Solomon encoding, Arweave adopts a full network replication model, while Walrus chooses a 2D encoding strategy, breaking through the storage efficiency ceiling.

Let's take a look at how it works. The core of RedStuff lies in the "hierarchical encoding of primary and secondary dimensions" logic. The primary dimension uses an f+1 recovery threshold, which can be achieved with just 3x replication factor for asynchronous writing; the secondary dimension expands through 2D encoding, adding only 1.5x redundancy, ultimately keeping the total replication factor at 4-5x. What does this mean? Filecoin requires 25x redundancy, Arweave is at the hundredfold level, and Walrus directly cuts this number down, making its advantage clear.

Performance-wise, there’s no compromise. Replacing complex polynomial calculations with simple XOR operations, encoding and decoding speeds are tripled. Restoring 1TB of data doesn’t require all shards—only a subset—so even if two-thirds of the nodes in the network go offline, data can still be reconstructed completely. This fault tolerance is especially practical in production environments.

Cost reduction is the most straightforward metric. The annual storage cost for 1TB drops to $50, saving 80%-98% compared to traditional solutions. At the same time, data availability remains stable at 99.9%, with retrieval latency ≤500ms, making it particularly suitable for scenarios with high-frequency access to hot data.

RedStuff also solves another difficult problem in storage proofs—scalability. Proof costs grow logarithmically with the number of files, allowing the network to scale horizontally to thousands of nodes, which is critical for large-scale applications. As a technological reserve of Mysten Labs, this encoding scheme has already been tested in the Sui mainnet, providing efficient solutions for high-frequency storage needs such as AI datasets and L2 transaction data.
WAL3,08%
FIL3,57%
AR1,64%
SUI0,28%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 8
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
memecoin_therapyvip
· 01-13 13:27
Uh, Walrus sounds really impressive—4-5 times redundancy compared to Filecoin's 25 times, the gap is a bit outrageous. The cost is directly cut by over 80%, but the problem is whether this technology can truly run stably on the mainnet. Using it on Sui is one thing. Mysten Labs' projects are generally good, but their publicity is always a bit more impressive than the actual performance. We still need to wait a few more months for actual data before deciding on the one-click triple connection. RedStuff's 2D encoding sounds scientific, but decentralized storage has too many pitfalls. Low price is good, but I'm worried about some unexpected issues popping up later. If it can truly stay stable at $50 per TB with 99.9% availability, it would have already revolutionized the industry. Retrieval latency within 500ms is acceptable; it all depends on how stable the nodes are. I just want to know if this thing will crash when used at scale. Nothing is certain until then.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHunter007vip
· 01-12 17:39
Wow, Walrus directly crushed Filecoin with a 4-5x vs 25x difference, what a gap... $50 per T? I need to quickly stock up on a few coins, this is the real storage revolution. Wait, did RedStuff really get verified on the Sui mainnet? That makes this thing even more credible.
View OriginalReply0
CircumferenceCommunityShootingvip
· 01-12 02:14
Damn, Walrus's 4-5x replication factor directly outperforms Filecoin and Arweave, these numbers are a bit outrageous Really? You can store 1TB for only $50 a year? I need to test it myself to believe it RedStuff's layered approach to primary and secondary dimensions is indeed innovative, but I have some doubts about XOR operations being three times faster than polynomial calculations The Sui ecosystem is really active in storage; it looks like they are betting big Wait, the promotional copy says 99.9% availability, but what about when 0.1% data is lost... I usually discount exaggerated figures like saving 80-98% on costs Expanding to thousands of nodes sounds good, but how stable are the actual nodes? That’s the real test Could this be another "revolutionary technology" that ultimately becomes a niche application?
View OriginalReply0
MEV_Whisperervip
· 01-12 01:54
Fourfold redundancy cut like this? How has Filecoin not gone crazy yet? Walrus's technology is indeed impressive, but I feel there are definitely pitfalls in the early stages. If they really cut costs by 80%, those old projects will have a tough time. Has this been tested on the Sui mainnet? That’s worth paying attention to. RedStuff sounds awesome, but I’m worried that actual deployment might be another story.
View OriginalReply0
FudVaccinatorvip
· 01-12 01:51
4-5x Copy Rate? Is this number real? You need to run the test yourself to be sure. --- Wait, can Walrus really maintain 99.9% stability? Let me see if there are genuine user feedbacks. --- The selling point is very tempting, but Filecoin has been running for so long. Why should we believe Walrus can revolutionize now? --- $50 a year? Unbelievably cheap. There must be a catch. --- RedStuff's reliability still depends on market testing. Anything said now is just talk. --- Mysten Labs' product does have backing, but don't forget Sui is still looking for application scenarios. --- XOR operation is three times faster, I believe it. But in real network environments, how can such data be guaranteed? --- Why does it feel like another "perfect solution"? Every new project claims to have solved all the issues of the previous generation.
View OriginalReply0
quietly_stakingvip
· 01-12 01:50
It's Walrus again leading the revolution, 4-5 times redundancy crushing Filecoin's 25 times—those numbers are truly impressive. Wait, is the 99.9% availability really stable in production environments? Or just on paper? Mysten Labs definitely has some real stuff, but could RedStuff also be just a hype concept? $50 a year sounds crazy; even the cheapest storage still relies on node operators to maintain. Suddenly remembered, what happened to the previous encoding optimization plan?
View OriginalReply0
MindsetExpandervip
· 01-12 01:44
Damn, Walrus really opened my eyes this time. 4-5x redundancy versus Filecoin's 25x, the gap... is a bit outrageous. Wait, can this cost be reduced by over 80%? Only $50 per year for 1TB? I feel like that's a bit too idealistic. Will it crash when actually running? Mysten Labs' technology is indeed impressive, but could the RedStuff two-dimensional encoding approach be too complicated? Small nodes might not be able to handle it.
View OriginalReply0
TokenomicsDetectivevip
· 01-12 01:25
Damn, Walrus's 4-5x replication factor directly outperforms Filecoin and Arweave, these numbers are a bit outrageous Really? You can store 1TB for only $50 a year? I need to test it myself to believe it RedStuff's layered approach to primary and secondary dimensions is indeed innovative, but I have some doubts about XOR operations being three times faster than polynomial calculations The Sui ecosystem is really active in storage; it looks like they are betting big Wait, the promotional copy says 99.9% availability, but what about when 0.1% data is lost... I usually discount exaggerated figures like saving 80-98% on costs Expanding to thousands of nodes sounds good, but how stable are the actual nodes? That’s the real test Could this be another "revolutionary technology" that ultimately becomes a niche application?
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)