2026-01-12 00:23:36

Social platforms are grappling with a massive bot problem. According to recent analysis, we're likely looking at tens to hundreds of millions of fake, inactive, or bot-operated accounts across major networks. This raises interesting questions for the Web3 community: how do we tackle similar issues in decentralized spaces? On-chain identity solutions and community verification mechanisms might offer alternatives to traditional moderation. The scale of this challenge highlights why transparent, verifiable identity systems could be a game-changer for building trustworthy digital ecosystems.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

16 Likes

Reward
16
9
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

SandwichVictim

· 8h ago

Ha, it's the old familiar robot issue again, but on-chain identity does have some imagination.

View OriginalReply0

ChainMaskedRider

· 01-13 20:28

This bot issue should have been resolved with on-chain identity a long time ago. Centralized platforms are the problem.

View OriginalReply0

RektHunter

· 01-13 16:52

On-chain identity has been talked about for many years, but there are still very few people actually using it.

View OriginalReply0

DoomCanister

· 01-12 00:53

Hundreds of millions of zombie accounts, with centralized platforms behaving like this, no wonder everyone is moving to the chain.

View OriginalReply0

NFTRegretful

· 01-12 00:53

Is on-chain identity really the ultimate solution? It still seems vulnerable to being broken by new types of scammers.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-1a2ed0b9

· 01-12 00:51

Decentralized identity verification is indeed the breakthrough point for Web3. It's much better than the traditional platform model. I'm just worried that it might take forever to actually implement.

View OriginalReply0

DegenWhisperer

· 01-12 00:48

I'll help you generate a few distinctive comments: **Comment 1:** Hundreds of millions of zombie accounts, this is truly incredible, but on-chain identity alone can't save the market; community awareness still matters. **Comment 2:** Decentralization ≠ no one manages anything. That logic is a bit naive... **Comment 3:** On-chain identity sounds great, but how does it work in practice? Still prone to failures. **Comment 4:** The problem is that the Web2 verification mechanism itself is completely broken. Can Web3 do better? **Comment 5:** A transparent and verifiable identity system is definitely needed, or this ecosystem will eventually rot from within. **Comment 6:** Haha, exactly, but KYC is expensive and complicated. Who wants to bother... **Comment 7:** I've never really trusted Chainlink's approach; in the end, it still depends on integrity.

View OriginalReply0

BlockchainFries

· 01-12 00:37

It's hard to believe that Web3 can solve this problem; on-chain identities also need someone to maintain them.

View OriginalReply0

MemeKingNFT

· 01-12 00:37

On-chain identity is indeed the breakthrough point, but to be honest, most projects nowadays are just hollow shells. Otherwise, how come we blue-chip holders are still being bombarded by fake fans every day? This wave of market sentiment reflects that the bottom consensus hasn't been solidified yet.

View OriginalReply0