Bitcoin isn't the next tulip craze—that's a lazy take. Michael Saylor breaks down why this narrative completely misses the mark. The reality? Bitcoin has become the go-to asset for sophisticated investors protecting their wealth. It's not about speculation or hype anymore; it's about smart money recognizing a fundamentally different asset class. Unlike historical bubbles driven by irrational exuberance, Bitcoin's adoption follows a clear pattern: institutions, high-net-worth individuals, and macro strategists treating it as digital gold. The comparison to tulips ignores a crucial distinction—one was a perishable commodity with no intrinsic mechanism to preserve value, while Bitcoin is a scarce, programmable, and defensible store of wealth. Saylor's point lands hard: when Google became the search standard, nobody seriously compared it to dot-com bubbles. The same logic applies here. Bitcoin isn't fighting for legitimacy anymore; it's reshaping how wealth gets preserved in the digital age.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
7 Likes
Reward
7
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
BTCRetirementFund
· 8h ago
Saylor's words are spot on. Bitcoin has long ceased to be gambling; now it's a game of institutions and smart money.
View OriginalReply0
SmartMoneyWallet
· 01-12 00:15
Another Saylor's "digital gold" argument... Do on-chain data really support this claim? I see that recently the whale wallet's chip distribution is actually pushing up and selling off, so what exactly is the "smart money" doing?
View OriginalReply0
liquiditea_sipper
· 01-12 00:15
Saylor's argument this time really hits the mark. The Tulip comparison is just too lazy. Bitcoin has long since passed the stage of being questioned.
View OriginalReply0
ZKProofster
· 01-12 00:09
technically speaking, the tulip comparison was dead on arrival—anyone with a basic understanding of cryptographic primitives and scarcity mechanisms would've seen that one coming. saylor's just stating the obvious here, ngl.
Reply0
LiquidityNinja
· 01-12 00:05
Saylor's logic is indeed brilliant. The old-fashioned tulip analogy should be retired; smart money has already understood.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-7b078580
· 01-12 00:04
Data shows that institutional inflows are indeed increasing, but the hourly fluctuations tell me a different story... Let's wait a bit longer, the historical lows haven't been reached yet. However, the fact that miners are consuming too much of this cost remains an unreasonable mechanism, and it will eventually collapse.
View OriginalReply0
MidnightTrader
· 01-11 23:55
Frustrated, I see that old and tired tulip argument again, really too lazy to bother. Saylor's recent speech was quite harsh; institutional money and digital gold are completely two different things... But honestly, trying to persuade those still debating the bubble is a waste of effort—they simply won't listen.
View OriginalReply0
SelfSovereignSteve
· 01-11 23:51
Saylor is right this time; Bitcoin has long ceased to be gambling. Institutional big players are accumulating, can it be compared to tulips?
Bitcoin isn't the next tulip craze—that's a lazy take. Michael Saylor breaks down why this narrative completely misses the mark. The reality? Bitcoin has become the go-to asset for sophisticated investors protecting their wealth. It's not about speculation or hype anymore; it's about smart money recognizing a fundamentally different asset class. Unlike historical bubbles driven by irrational exuberance, Bitcoin's adoption follows a clear pattern: institutions, high-net-worth individuals, and macro strategists treating it as digital gold. The comparison to tulips ignores a crucial distinction—one was a perishable commodity with no intrinsic mechanism to preserve value, while Bitcoin is a scarce, programmable, and defensible store of wealth. Saylor's point lands hard: when Google became the search standard, nobody seriously compared it to dot-com bubbles. The same logic applies here. Bitcoin isn't fighting for legitimacy anymore; it's reshaping how wealth gets preserved in the digital age.