2026-01-11 23:30:26

Traditional fintech is finished. What's replacing it? The old playbook—centralized platforms, rent-seeking intermediaries, walled gardens—doesn't cut it anymore. Users are moving toward composable finance, transparent on-chain settlement, and protocols that don't require blind trust in a corporation.

The new fintech era runs on different DNA. Smart contracts replacing legacy middleware. Open liquidity pools instead of gatekept access. Users hold actual ownership rather than being glorified account numbers. DeFi primitives are clunky today, sure. But they're shipping what traditional fintech promises but never delivers: true interoperability, verifiable transactions, and permission-less innovation.

The winners won't be the next Stripe clone. They'll be whoever builds the infrastructure for this shift—better UX layers, cross-chain bridges, decentralized settlement rails. The old fintech had a 20-year run. The new one is just getting started.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

17 Likes

Reward
17
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

PuzzledScholar

· 8h ago

Here comes the DeFi savior again... The real issue is whether the UX is still a mess; who would want to use it?

View OriginalReply0

LiquidatedDreams

· 8h ago

NGL, Stripe guys should be worried, but the UX of DeFi is really terrible right now. --- It's the same old argument of "traditional finance is doomed"... Wait until DeFi truly stabilizes before bragging. --- The infrastructure layer is the next big money-making opportunity. If you disagree, you just haven't seen it clearly. --- Finally, someone dares to say it directly: centralized platforms are a huge trap. --- Permission-less innovation is indeed a dead end, but who will bear the risks? --- Cross-chain bridges are still a bunch of shit right now. Don't overestimate them. --- Ownership vs. account number—this difference really changes the game. --- Wait, do we really need to go fully decentralized? Or is it just another marketing scam? --- I believe smart contracts replacing middleware is promising, but it will take ten years to become widespread. --- UX is the real bottleneck. No matter how good the protocol is, if no one uses it, it's useless.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-75ee51e7

· 01-12 10:05

Sounds good, but in reality, most people are still using traditional apps, and on-chain settlement is so slow it's taking off. DeFi's liquidity can't support real financial scenarios at all; don't get ahead of yourself. Claiming traditional finance is dead before infrastructure is properly built is typical Web3 behavior. Wait until user experience actually improves before you start bragging. Smart contract bugs are everywhere—this is supposed to be the replacement? That's a bit optimistic.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropHunter007

· 01-12 00:00

To be honest, traditional finance practices really should phase out, but DeFi is still too much of a leek-cutting game right now. Wait, can UX really be improved? To me, it's just a tech geek toy. I agree, decentralized settlement should have come long ago. Stripe and others should be worried. However, with cross-chain bridges being so unstable right now, who dares to go all in? The bosses are finally going to break the profit monopoly. This is truly a system-level transformation. I feel it will take another five years to see real implementation; right now, it's all just talk.

View OriginalReply0

MidnightTrader

· 01-11 23:59

Traditional financial technology is really doomed... but to be honest, the current DeFi mess isn't much better either. --- This time it's truly different. Decentralization is not just a hype; it's genuinely changing the game. --- Wait, composable finance sounds cool, but where are the usable products? Still a bunch of vaporware. --- Smart contracts replacing middleware? Gas fees are almost driving people crazy now, so what interoperability are we talking about? --- I agree, the good days of Stripe and others are over. But the new infrastructure isn't fully built yet, and we're still in the wild growth stage. --- Permission-less innovation sounds great, but... scammers can also put anything on the chain freely. --- Finally someone said it: traditional fintech is just a vampire. Damn. --- There are still so many bugs in cross-chain bridges; who dares to trust them truly? --- The old world of 20 years versus the just-started new world, this battle is far from over.

View OriginalReply0

MEVHunterWang

· 01-11 23:51

No problem with that, the days of traditional financial intermediaries bleeding dry are indeed over. --- UX is still a big issue. Currently, the DeFi experience is far worse than Stripe. --- Cross-chain bridging is the real bottleneck; without solving this, everything else is pointless. --- Laughing out loud, Stripe's team should start to panic, although they might not realize it yet. --- Composable finance sounds good, but how many projects have actually been implemented? --- The monopoly of 2020 definitely needs to be broken, but permission-less also means more junk projects. --- Replacing middleware with smart contracts? It's still a gathering place for all kinds of ghosts and monsters; reliable ones are few. --- I'm optimistic about infrastructure, but we need to wait until UX truly improves. --- Ownership is a valid point, but most people don't even know what they are holding. --- Transparency is a facade; on-chain data can also be manipulated. Don't be too naive.

View OriginalReply0

ImpermanentLossFan

· 01-11 23:42

Is traditional fintech really going to fade away? I’m skeptical; they’re bragging before even fixing the UX. --- I believed the day cross-chain bridges exploded, but now it’s just a different form of centralized cover-up. --- Sounds nice, but who’s willing to pay extra gas for "true ownership"... --- Smart contracts replacing middleware? Wait, who will replace failed audits and flash loans? --- Composable finance sounds great, but the actual interaction is still a mess. Don’t get ahead of yourself. --- In the end, the winners will definitely be big institutions—they’re just finding new ways to harvest profits. --- I agree with this view, but the reality is harsh; most people don’t want to self-manage their assets. --- Permission-less sounds free, but it’s really just no one responsible. --- Infrastructure is indeed lacking, but this article reads like a revelation of a new era—over the top. --- Yes, in the next decade, let’s see who can make the user experience approach Stripe’s level.

View OriginalReply0

0xSleepDeprived

· 01-11 23:36

NGL, the last fig leaf of traditional finance is also about to be torn off. On-chain settlement transparency is the real deal. --- It sounds good, but the UX experience of current dApps is still terrible. How long do we have to wait? --- Bro Stripe is still counting money. It's too early to say that. --- Composable Finance sounds promising, but who will bear the clearing costs? --- Decentralized authority sounds comfortable, but most people simply don't want to manage private keys themselves... --- Cross-chain bridges are about to explode. Currently, they are all toy-level solutions. --- I agree, centralized middlemen are damn, but it will take 3-5 years to truly implement. --- Infrastructure can't keep up. There's a bunch of pitfalls in the USX layer.

View OriginalReply0