2026-01-11 23:23:06

Dynamic Fee Mechanism is Here

This upgrade allows fees to "breathe"—they will automatically adjust according to market fluctuations.

When volatility is high, fees go up; when the market is stable, they decrease. What are the benefits of this approach?

From the LP perspective: deeper liquidity pools + higher returns. Your capital utilization is maximized.

For governance voters: they can earn a larger share of the fees. Participating in ecosystem decisions truly pays off.

For trading users: slippage is reduced, and execution prices are closer to the ideal price.

In simple terms, this mechanism ensures that every participant benefits—this is the true essence of capital efficiency.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

15 Likes

Reward
15
10
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

MentalWealthHarvester

· 11h ago

Breathing fee? Feels like this time there's really something to it. It seems LPs are truly making a killing this time; with deeper liquidity, the returns are also taking off. Dynamic adjustment sounds good, but in practice, it might be another story. This logic is perfect; it all depends on how long they can stick to it without changing. Reduced slippage is indeed satisfying; finally, we don't have to lose so much to it. Does every role have a return? I like this design idea, but somehow it doesn't feel very realistic. Governance voting can allocate fees, so participation should increase now.

View OriginalReply0

ForkTongue

· 01-14 03:31

Breathing fees? Sounds fancy, but can it actually be implemented? --- Can LP really enjoy this round of benefits, or is it just another castle in the air? --- Slippage was much smaller this time, didn't boast about it. --- Governance voting can share fees, now I have to choose carefully. --- It's both capital efficiency and mechanism optimization; anyway, I just want to see how much gas can be saved. --- Market volatility fees are rising along with the market. When losing money, the fees are still high? That's a bit uncomfortable. --- Liquidity pool depth + doubled yields? Let's wait and see, afraid it's just another new trick to cut leeks. --- This design logic is indeed brilliant, tying everyone's interests together.

View OriginalReply0

RetailTherapist

· 01-12 08:01

Everyone is talking about this "Breath," but I'm afraid it's just another prelude to a new round of cutting leeks. It's interesting; the automatic fee adjustment seems pretty clever. The question is, who decides what "volatility" is? Can slippage really be reduced, or is it just a gimmick? The actual trading costs might even be higher... LPs can indeed earn passively, but in the end, retail investors still foot the bill—familiar story. Does governance voting have returns? Ha, only if you really have a say.

View OriginalReply0

GasDevourer

· 01-11 23:51

Breathing fee? Sounds good, but can LPs really enjoy that wave of returns, or are they being exploited again by big players? --- I believe in reducing slippage, but the problem is whether the trading depth is sufficient. Otherwise, it might still be a lonely pool. --- Everyone has returns; I've heard this countless times... In reality, it's still the top players taking the big slices and small investors drinking the soup. --- Wait, what's the logic behind dynamically adjusting fees? When market volatility is high, the fee increases. Isn't that like taking an extra cut when you're already losing? --- Governance voting fee division? Then how many Tokens do I need to hold to see real cash? Or is it another attractive yet deceptive design? --- Capital efficiency... This term has really become a universal formula now, but can deep liquidity and high returns really appear at the same time?

View OriginalReply0

SchrodingerWallet

· 01-11 23:50

Fees breathe, and so does my wallet, but usually it's the kind when you're trapped in a position.

View OriginalReply0

AirDropMissed

· 01-11 23:43

This design is truly amazing; finally someone thought of the idea of letting fees "breathe." Wow, isn't this giving LPs a shot of adrenaline? Liquidity is skyrocketing. The slippage is small, I love you.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-bd883c58

· 01-11 23:41

Amazing, the fees are in sync with the market movements. Finally, it's not just one-sidedly cutting the leeks anymore. Can the fees really be reduced? I just can't believe it. LPs can now earn passively, maximizing capital utilization—what's going on? I feel like another wave of cuts is coming. Lower slippage sounds good, but let's see how it performs during actual trading. Participating in governance can earn more fees? Alright, this time the ecosystem has some substance.

View OriginalReply0

BagHolderTillRetire

· 01-11 23:33

This mechanism sounds pretty good, but I just want to know if the fees will skyrocket during periods of high volatility?

View OriginalReply0

TokenomicsDetective

· 01-11 23:31

Alright, this mechanism design actually has some substance. LPs need to make a good profit this time. Damn, isn't this just a disguised way to encourage market volatility to rush in? I kind of get it now. Dynamic fees sound pretty good, but I'm worried that executing it might be another story. I respect this logic. Every role has something to gain, and the ecosystem design is quite balanced. Wait, when volatility is high, the fees go up. Isn't this a disguised form of taxation...

View OriginalReply0

ZenChainWalker

· 01-11 23:26

Breathing fee? Sounds pretty scientific, but there probably won't be many days when it actually reduces costs. This system is definitely sweet for LPs, but what about retail investors... Will the slippage really decrease?

View OriginalReply0