Stablecoin Policy Game: Major Exchanges' Firm Stance on the US Legislation

robot
Abstract generation in progress

【Crypto World】A major exchange recently voiced their stance to the U.S. Congress, urging lawmakers to protect the platform’s right to issue stablecoin rewards. The implication is clear—if the upcoming cryptocurrency legislation not only requires enhanced disclosure but also adds other restrictive provisions, they will have to reconsider whether to continue supporting the bill.

This actually reflects an old issue: the regulatory status of stablecoins in the United States has always been ambiguous. Exchanges view stablecoin rewards as an important tool to attract users and enhance competitiveness, while regulators are concerned about the potential risks these products may pose. Both sides have their own concerns—one wants to maintain operational flexibility, the other aims to prevent financial risks.

From the exchange’s perspective, this is a stress test at the final stage of the bill—by clearly expressing their stance, they send a signal to legislators: excessive regulation could be counterproductive, potentially raising barriers to entry and weakening America’s competitiveness in the crypto industry. Whether it will be effective depends on how Congress weighs the pros and cons.

View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
RetiredMinervip
· 01-11 23:48
Coming back with this again? Exchanges threatening legislators, really thinking of themselves as the parent. Stablecoin rewards are indeed attractive, but challenging Congress so aggressively... really not afraid of getting into trouble. I think in the end, there will still be compromises; the US won't relax easily. This move is truly a gambler's mentality; winning is unlikely. What sounds like a stress test is actually just a form of coercion.
View OriginalReply0
TopEscapeArtistvip
· 01-11 23:48
Starting to shift the blame again... This move by the exchange is a high-level bottom-fishing political price cut. From a technical perspective, it looks like a head and shoulders top, waiting for a breakdown.
View OriginalReply0
ShibaMillionairen'tvip
· 01-11 23:47
Haha, here we go again with the conditions. The trick of exchanges saying "If you don't let me issue tokens, I won't play" is really unbeatable.
View OriginalReply0
TokenCreatorOPvip
· 01-11 23:46
It's a typical capital game; exchanges are really good at calculating accounts. As soon as stablecoin rewards stop, users leave. It's just muddling through. The SEC wants to regulate but is also afraid of hurting the industry. This game isn't over. The US legislation keeps getting delayed and delayed, and we're all getting tired of waiting.
View OriginalReply0
LongTermDreamervip
· 01-11 23:42
Coming with this again? I heard this three years ago haha. I give full marks to the exchange's move this time; soft tactics are the most comfortable. Honestly, it's just a gamble that regulatory authorities will back down. But to be honest — I think they bet right this time.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • بالعربية
  • Português (Brasil)
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Español
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Русский
  • 繁體中文
  • Українська
  • Tiếng Việt