Look, it makes sense why management has been restructuring the platform this aggressively. When the acquisition closed, the business was bleeding—we're talking nine-figure annual losses. That's a massive hole to plug.
Every major pivot since then has been laser-focused on fixing the financials. Workforce reductions, premium subscription rollouts, ad revenue optimization—these aren't random moves. They're textbook turnaround strategies.
Yes, the algorithm changes have been controversial in crypto circles. But here's the thing: you can't ignore balance sheets. Whether you agree with the execution or not, the underlying logic is straightforward. When you inherit a business hemorrhaging that much capital, you have limited options. Cut costs, diversify revenue streams, improve unit economics.
The platform needed to become profitable. That was always going to require difficult decisions.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
8 Likes
Reward
8
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
DecentralizeMe
· 01-11 22:53
In plain terms, no one can withstand spending so much money; a tough operation is necessary.
View OriginalReply0
DeFiVeteran
· 01-11 22:51
Honestly, I can understand the management's move this time. Taking over a mess, everyone has to be ruthless. But I just want to ask—can these decisions really save this game now?
---
Getting used to cutting leeks, now it's our own people being cut.
---
The balance sheet looks better, but what about user experience? Anyway, I’ve left.
---
NGL, this is a typical "amputation to save life." The problem is, after cutting off the leg, can it still run?
---
Nine-figure loss... Good grief, how many people need to be cut to fill this gap?
---
So basically, it's out of money, everything is just to survive.
---
I'll just see how long this premium strategy can last. Anyway, the era of high fees should be coming to an end.
View OriginalReply0
NFTArchaeologist
· 01-11 22:37
To be honest, I knew it was time to cut losses when it hit nine figures. Nothing surprising about that.
The crypto world is chaotic, but financial reports are something you can't run away from when they're right in front of you.
Layoffs, subscriptions, advertising... this combination isn't actually a problem; it's just the way it's executed that feels off.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-a180694b
· 01-11 22:35
Basically, it's about staying alive. Who can handle a nine-figure loss?
Look, it makes sense why management has been restructuring the platform this aggressively. When the acquisition closed, the business was bleeding—we're talking nine-figure annual losses. That's a massive hole to plug.
Every major pivot since then has been laser-focused on fixing the financials. Workforce reductions, premium subscription rollouts, ad revenue optimization—these aren't random moves. They're textbook turnaround strategies.
Yes, the algorithm changes have been controversial in crypto circles. But here's the thing: you can't ignore balance sheets. Whether you agree with the execution or not, the underlying logic is straightforward. When you inherit a business hemorrhaging that much capital, you have limited options. Cut costs, diversify revenue streams, improve unit economics.
The platform needed to become profitable. That was always going to require difficult decisions.