At this stage, I've noticed that whenever something gets labeled as an NGO or 'non-profit,' my first instinct is to be skeptical. The branding alone feels like a red flag. In a space where scams are rampant, these labels have become too convenient—they're used to build trust exactly when you should be doing more homework. It's worth questioning: what's really behind the name? Because in crypto and beyond, a fancy label doesn't guarantee good intentions.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
bridge_anxietyvip
· 17h ago
The "NGO" label has been everywhere in the crypto world for a long time; seeing one and suspecting it is almost always correct.
View OriginalReply0
PriceOracleFairyvip
· 01-11 22:50
ngo tag feels like a vector for social engineering tbh... watched too many "charitable" projects execute exit scams to trust labels anymore. the label itself IS the anomaly worth analyzing 👀
Reply0
Deconstructionistvip
· 01-11 22:49
NGO and non-profit rhetoric has been played out in the crypto world for a long time. To put it simply, it's a trust vending machine. Really, as soon as this label appears, I start to dig. The brighter the label, the deeper the scam. This is common sense.
View OriginalReply0
MindsetExpandervip
· 01-11 22:43
NGO, non-profit, I've been tired of this kind of talk for a long time, bro. The套路 is too deep.
View OriginalReply0
MelonFieldvip
· 01-11 22:33
That NGO's tactics are really deep. Anyone who believes it is foolish.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)